Back
H. P. SANDESH
Deekshith – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail, in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime No. 139/2021 registered by Vitla Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of IPC and Sections 6(1) and 5(n) of POCSO Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix discloses that a case has been registered based on the complaint of the victim at Kasargod in Crime No. 55/2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of IPC and Sections 6(1) and 5(n) of the POCSO Act and the petitioner was enlarged on bail at Kasargod Court and thereafter, for want of registration, the matter was transferred and the same was renumbered as Crime No. 139/2021 of Vitla Police, Dakshina Kannada. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that, he being the cousin of the victim, subjected her for sexual act in the month of March, 2020, when the victim went to attend the marriage in the night by providing intoxicated juice to her and the complaint
Discrepancies in victim's statements, absence of supporting evidence, and delay in filing the complaint can be considered in granting bail.
The court's decision hinged on the prima facie case against the petitioner in a matter involving allegations of sexual offences against a minor, leading to the denial of anticipatory bail.
The court considered the victim's consistent allegations, medical evidence, and pending DNA report in rejecting the bail petition.
The credibility of the victim's statements and the weight given to different statements made by the victim before the police and under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. were crucial in determining the prima fac....
Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception, and the court must consider various factors, including the nature of the offense and the character of the accused, when deciding on bail applications.
The seriousness of the offence, victim's statement, and medical evidence must be considered in bail decisions, and reasons for granting bail must be recorded.
Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception. The court must consider various factors, including the nature and seriousness of the offence, when deciding on bail in a non-bailable offence.
The timing of the sexual act in relation to the marriage is crucial in determining the applicability of certain offences and the grant of bail.
Grant of regular bail is permissible when there are significant contradictions in the prosecution's narrative, unexplained delays in recording critical statements, and doubt regarding the veracity of....
The court considered the victim's conflicting statements, her age, and the circumstances of her marriage in granting bail to the accused, highlighting the importance of evaluating the totality of cir....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
