IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. Nagaprasanna, J.
Smt. Rajamma H. - Appellant
Versus
Thimmaiah V - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11265 of 2022 (GM-RES)
Decided On : 09-06-2022
Mandamus - Disposal of Application under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - The court directed the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III, Bangalore to dispose of the application for maintenance filed by the petitioner within two weeks in compliance with Section 12(5) of the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III, Bangalore to dispose of the interlocutory/main application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 within three months. The petitioner also filed an interlocutory application seeking maintenance, which had not been considered by the court for over six months.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the application for maintenance had not been considered within the stipulated time frame as per Section 12(5) of the Act, and therefore, directed the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III to dispose of the application within two weeks.
Issues: Delay in disposal of application for maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 12(5) of the Act, which mandates the disposal of every application made under the Act within a period of sixty days from the date of its first hearing.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III at Bangalore was directed to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner seeking maintenance within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the court's order.
ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III, Bangalore to dispose of the interlocutory/main application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ('the Act' for short) in Criminal Miscellaneous No.120 of 2021 in an outer limit of three months.
2. Heard Sri K. Raghavendra Gowda, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The petitioner files application invoking Section 12 of the Act on several allegations. The allegation made in the application is not the issue before this Court. Along with the application the petitioner also filed an interlocutory application seeking maintenance in her favour. The said application was filed on 12-11-2021 along with the main application. Notice is issued in the case on 20-12-2021 after which, the order sheet reveals that there has been no consideration of the application filed by the petitioner seeking maintenance.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that every application accompanying the main application should be decided by the learned Magistrate within three months from the date of its presentation in terms of Section 12 of the Act. Since there is no compliance with the provision, the petitioner has presented the present petition seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of the interlocutory application by the learned Magistrate.
5. The application is filed admittedly invoking Section 12 of the Act. Sub-section (5) of Section 12 of the Act reads as follows:
12. Application to Magistrate.-.....
(5) The Magistrate shall Endeavour to dispose of every application made under sub-section (1) within a period of sixty days from the date of its first hearing.
Sub-section (5) mandates that every application filed under the Act shall be disposed of by the Court within six months from the date of its presentation. The order sheet reveals that the application was filed on 12-11-2021 seeking maintenance. Six months have passed by. The order sheet does not demonstrate any consideration of the application. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to a mandamus at the hands of this Court or a direction to the learned Magistrate to dispose of the application for maintenance expeditiously.
6. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is allowed and the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III at Bangalore is directed to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner, along with Criminal Miscellaneous No.120 of 2021 seeking maintenance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
AI
Section 12(5) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 mandates the expeditious disposal of applications made under the Act within a specified time frame.
Section 12 reads as application to Magistrate.
The main legal point established is the appealability of orders under Sections 12 and 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the limited scope for interference by the app....
The court mandates expedited hearings for domestic violence applications under the D.V. Act, stressing the need to avoid delays caused by additional petitions and encouraging timely resolutions.
Domestic Violence Act, 2005 has been enacted with object of providing effective rights of protection to women guaranteed under Article 15 of Constitution, who are victim of any kind of violence withi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.