IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ALOK ARADHE, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ.
Karnataka State Pvt. Homeopathic Medical College Managements Association – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Sidda and Homoeopathy – Respondent
W.P. No. 25723 of 2022
Decided On : 03-03-2023
Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973 - National Commission of Homeopathy Act, 2010 - Sections 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 43, 44, 55 (2)(i)(m) - National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 14 - National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 - Sections 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 43, 44 and 55, (2)(m) - Homeopathy - Pass an interim order for academic session - Declare provisions unconstitutional - Issue a writ in nature of declaration, declaring that Sections 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 43, 44, 55 (2)(i)(m) of National Commission of Homeopathy Act, 2010 are manifestly arbitrary, unworkable and unconstitutional and strike down aforesaid provisions – Regulations do not provide that they would operate from any anterior date - Para 38.
Finding of the Court: From perusal of Section 55 of 2020 Act, which deals with power to make Regulations, it is evident that same does not confer any power to frame Regulations with retrospective effect - Regulations do not provide that they would operate from any anterior date - Similarly, guidelines issued in exercise of powers under Section 43 and 44 of 2020 Act also cannot apply to process of admission, which was already commenced - It is noteworthy that Government order was passed after consulting petitioners - Petitioners in pursuance of aforesaid order have admitted students in their quota of seats - Therefore, same binds petitioners - Sections 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 43, 44 and 55(2)(m) of National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 are valid and constitutional - Government Order making 2022 Regulations applicable in respect of admission to B.H.M.S. under graduate course for academic session is quashed.
Result: Petition disposed of.
ORDER :
1. The petitioner No. 1 is an Association of Private Homeopathic Medical Colleges in the State of Karnataka. The members of petitioner No. 1-Association with an intent to impart education in Homeopathy system of medicine have established Colleges and teaching hospitals under the provisions of Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973, in different parts of the State. In the said colleges, education is imparted in homeopathy in Under Graduate and Post Graduate courses. The petitioners in this writ petition seek the following reliefs:
(b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction to declare that the Regulations of 2022 (vide Annexure N) notified by the respondent No. 2, in so far as they seek to regulate, finding it necessary and permits adopting NEET of National Medical Commissioner and counselling process and a seat matrix stipulating ‘quotas’ for admission in private institutions, as manifestly arbitrary and illegal.
(c) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order, or direction to declare that ‘the Addendum’ dated 13.12.2022 bearing No. AKUKA 253 PIM 2022 (vide Annexure P) issued by the respondent No. 3 is illegal, unreasonable and unenforceable and quash the same.
(d) Issue a writ directing that, counselling for the ‘Management Quota’ of 60% as of last academic year having been completed by the members of the 1st petitioner Association based on NEET merit list and G.O. dated 13.10.2022 same be permitted and continued; the KEA filling the balance of Government quota seats to sub serve the reservation policy of the state per ‘seat sharing’ Annexure K and these petitioners be permitted to conduct ‘counselling for NRI/Management Quota seats’ based on inter se merit of applicants to the individual institutions at their level; subject to a rider that ‘the fee notified’ is tentative, that ‘the fee fixation committee’ would examine some of the fee proposal that may be filed and approved; on which event, said ‘fees’ determined would be applicable for the current year on-words as well. Further be pleased to direct the KEA to inform the students to likely increase in the fees which they would be liable to pay, in the event of determination of higher fees by the committee.
(e) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,; directing the 6th respondent-Fee Regulatory Committee to determine the fee for the Homeopathy colleges for the Academic year 2022-23, within a fixed time frame taking into consideration the balance sheets of a few colleges to arrive at an average fee to be applied to all the institutions in the State in view of the counselling process commencing and also to take into consideration the comprehensive guidelines issued by the NCH for determination of fee.
(f) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the state to cause determination of ‘tuition fee’ payable by a committee in terms of Section 6 and 7 of 2006 Act and that till ‘the Fee Regulatory Committee’ take the decision fixing the fee, amounts indicated in Govt. Order dated 13.10.2022 (vide Annexure K) be operated.
(g) Grant such other order or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of this case.
2. The relevant facts need mention, which are stated hereinafter. The State Government issued a notification dated 27.01.2018, wherein it was provided that in view of decision taken by ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Sidda and Homeopathy, it has decided to adopt National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) in place of Common Entrance Test for Ayush course in Government as well as private colleges in the State of Karnataka from the academic session 2018-19 and the admission shal
Federation of Indian Mineral Industries and Others vs. Union of India and Another
Christian Medical College Vellore Association vs. Union of India
Christian Medical College vs. Union of India
Dental Council of India vs. Biyani Shikshan Samiti
Govt. of A.P. vs. P. Laxmi Devi
Hukum Chand vs. Union of India
Harshit Agarwal vs. Union of India
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India and Others
Modern Dental College and Research Centre vs. State of M.P. (2016) 7 SCC 353
Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Haryana
Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India
P.A. Inamdar vs. State of Maharashtra
Parayankandiyal Eravath Kanapravan Kalliani Amma vs. K. Devi
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia vs. S.R. Tendolkar
T.M.A. Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka
Union of India vs. Elphinstone Spinning and Weavign Co. Ltd. (2001) 4 SCC 139
Vice Chancellor M.D. University Rohtak vs. Jahan Singh
Veternary Council of India v. Indian Council for Agricultural Research
Section 55(2)(m) of 2020 Act does not authorize Central Government to give advisory/instructions to National Testing Agency.
The UOI cannot impose NEET qualifications for AYUSH admissions without legislative backing, as executive actions cannot override statutory regulations.
Admission regulations for homeopathy postgraduate courses must comply with statutory procedures; deviations are not permissible, especially post cut-off date.
The State cannot compel minority institutions to share seats; it must ensure transparent, merit-based admissions without compromising minority character.
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
The court emphasized that any educational regulations for admissions, such as NEET, must comply with statutory procedures, failing which they are rendered unenforceable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.