Back
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Rajesh K. S. N (K. S. N. Rajesh) S/o Late K. N. Seetharamaiah – Appellant
Versus
State By Karnataka Through Mangalore Women Police Station Represented By Spp High Court Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.2108 of 2022 pending before the JMFC (III Court), Mangaluru arising out of charge sheet in Crime No.78 of 2021 of Mangalore Women Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(k), 376C(a), 511, 354A, 354B, 354C, 354D, 506, 384, 388, 389, 204, 203, 212, 120B, 179, 202 r/w 149 of the IPC.
2. The facts adumbrated, are as follows:-
The petitioner is a practicing Advocate. The 2nd respondent is the complainant. It is the case of the prosecution that the 2nd respondent, a second year law student of the SDM College gets to know the petitioner through one Mr. Dhruva Hegde, a classmate and friend. It is the case that the 2nd respondent was in requirement of work-cum-internship and, therefore, informs Mr. Dhruva Hegde to search out a place for internship. It is then Mr. Dhruva Hegde introduced to his brother-in-law one Mr. Shivanandana who was in contact with the petitioner. It is on the recommendation of Mr. Shivanandana, the complainant joins the office of the petitioner on 14-08-2021. It is said that the petitioner had narrated of the job and also indicated that the
It being a settled principle of law that to exercise powers under Section 482 CrPC, complaint in its entirety shall have to be examined on basis of allegation made in complaint.
Judicial proceedings involving allegations of cheating and forgery must undergo comprehensive investigation; prima facie evidence suffices for proceeding, dismissing claims of civil nature.
The evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be looked into by the court at the pre-trial stage. The court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings is to prevent ....
Point of Law : Delay in lodging the FIR, final report being filed by an officer who was not in-charge of the Police Station; act of the learned Magistrate in taking cognizance of the offence which be....
The court held that uniformity in witness statements does not invalidate a trial, and procedural lapses under relevant laws do not preclude prosecution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an investigation conducted without the prior permission of the Magistrate, as mandated under Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C., is illegal and renders....
The Magistrate must apply judicial mind when taking cognizance and issuing summons, ensuring sufficient grounds exist for proceeding with the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
