M. NAGAPRASANNA
JSW Steel Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. 1st petitioner common in both the petitions and petitioner No.2 in Writ Petition No.11399 of 2022, a representative of the 1st petitioner in the writ petition, who will be for the sake of convenience referred to as 'either the petitioner or the Company', are before this court in the subject petitions.
2. Petitioner in W.P.No.7499 of 2022 seeks quashment of all proceedings including investigation or any other proceedings taken against it and its officials emanating from ECIR/09/BZ/2012 and the petitioners in W.P.No.11399 of 2022 call in question an order dtd. 11/4/2022 by which the concerned Court takes cognizance of the offences against the petitioners and issues summons. In effect both these petitions arise out of common facts and grounds except a subsequent event dtd. 11/4/2022 being called in question in the latter petition. Therefore, both these petitions are taken together and considered by this common order.
3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petitions, as projected by the prosecution, are as follows:- 1st Petitioner is a public limited company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act , 1956 ('the Act' for short) and is in the business
Bank of India vs. Kethan Parekh
Bhushan Kumar vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Chief Enforcement Officer vs. Videocon Inter- National Limited
D.K. Trivedi and Sons vs. State of Gujarat
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
Mohinder Kumar vs. State of Haryana
R.R. Chari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Bihar vs. Deokaran Nenshi
State of Gujarat vs. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.