Back
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
Mohammed Ayoob – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges related to dowry and suicide (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial verdict and responses from parties (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. testimonies and credibility of witnesses (Para 6) |
| 4. arguments on evidence and investigation (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 20) |
| 5. legal definitions and requirements for conviction (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. circumstantial evidence and presumption of abetment (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. final judgment and sentence details (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Rural Police, Chintamani, charge sheeted two accused persons for their trial in relation to offences punishable under Sec. 3, 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Sec. 498A, 304B, 302 and 306 IPC. Initially, the trial court framed charges for the offences punishable under Sec. 3, 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, and Sec. 498A, 304B and 306 IPC. Charge under Sec. 302 IPC was raised at later stage.
2. The prosecution case is this : Reshma Taj, daughter of PW2 and PW3, was given in marriage to accused. Their marriage was solemnized on 5/6/2005. She died on 7/10/2007. PW2 made a report of death of his daughter to the police alleging that three months before the marriage, there took place a negotiation in connection with the marr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
