RAJESH RAI K.
B. V. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. This appeal filed by the convicted accused is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed in special case No.126/2009 dtd. 23/7/2011 by the District and Special Judge at Chamarajanagara wherein, the appellant/accused was convicted for the alleged offence punishable under Ss. 7 and 13(1)d r/w Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') and directed to undergo imprisonment for a period of 4 years and also to pay a fine of Rs.25, 000.00 in default, he shall suffer further simple imprisonment for a period of 5 months.
2. The factual matrix of the prosecution case are that:-
The appellant was working as Taluk Executive Officer of Taluk Panchayat at Yelandur. Under Dr.B.R.Ambedkar self employment scheme, the complainant-Shivamurthy, who was examined as PW.2 in this case and other beneficiaries have applied for loan in the said scheme at Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Development Corporation. The appellant/accused being Executive Officer of Taluk Panchayat had to send recommendation to the said development corporation for sanctioning the loan under the said scheme. In this regard, PW.2-the complainant, PW.4-Ningaraju and CW.8-
B Jayraj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
K. Shantamma vs. State of Telangana
Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan vs. State of Gujurat
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
N. Vijaykumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Nanjappa vs. State of Karnataka
Neeraj Dutta vs. State (Government of Nct of Delhi)
P Sathyanarayana Murthy vs. District Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh
V Sejappa vs. State By Police Inspector Lokayuktha Chitradurga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.