IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Prasanna B. Varale, M.G.S. Kamal, JJ.
Principal Secretary To Government – Appellant
Versus
Ranjith K.P. – Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 191 of 2023 (MV)
Decided On : 27-07-2023
MORTH - Registration of Motor Vehicles - Central Motor Vehicles (20th Amendment) Rules 2021 - Sec. 64 of the M.V. Act - Article 256 of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways introduced a new registration mark called Bharath Series (BH Series) for new motor vehicles, allowing seamless transfer of vehicles from one State to another. The State Government excluded private sector employees from registering under BH series, leading to writ petitions. The State Government argued that the notification from MORTH did not warrant implementation by the State and would cause a loss in tax collection.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Central Government's notification and the corresponding rules provided a voluntary option for vehicle registration under BH series, and the State Government was obligated to implement them under Article 256 of the Constitution of India. The Court dismissed the appeals, stating that the appellants did not provide grounds for interference with the impugned order.
Issues: Exclusion of private sector employees from registering under BH series, State's authority to refuse implementation of MORTH's notification, and potential loss in tax collection.
Ratio Decidendi: The Central Government's notification and rules provided a legal framework for the voluntary registration of vehicles under BH series, and the State Government was obligated to implement them. The State's concerns about tax collection and the authority to exclude private sector employees were not justified.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, upholding the impugned order that directed the State Government to register motor vehicles of the writ petitioners under BH series and implement the Central Motor Vehicles (20th Amendment) Rules 2021.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
M.G.S.KAMAL, J. - Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (hereinafter referred to as 'MORTH'), Government of India, by its Notification bearing No.GSR 594(E) dtd. 26/8/2021 as per Annexure-D introduced a new registration mark for new motor vehicles called Bharath Series (hereinafter referred to as "BH Series"), process of which would not require assignment of new registration mark, if the owner of the vehicle moves from one State to another. The said facility was made available on voluntary basis to defence personnel, employees of Central Government/State Government, Central/State Government Public Sector undertakings, private sector companies/organisation, which are having their offices in four or more States/Union Territories.
2. In furtherance to the said notification, the appellant No.2- Commissioner of Transport, Road Safety, Bengaluru, had issued a communication bearing No.TC/Regn.-1-PR-412/2021-22 dtd. 20/12/2021, as per Annexure-G to register new non transport vehicles of persons in the first phase, excluding private sector employees, under BH series registration.
3. Writ petitioners/respondent No.1 in both the appeals aggrieved by the aforesaid communication dtd. 20/12/2021 issued by appellant No.2 excluding registration of new non-transport vehicles of private sector employees under BH series, filed the present writ petitions.
4. Subsequent to filing of the writ petitions, by another communication dtd. 11/5/2022 (as per Annexure-R-1 to the Statement of objections filed by the appellant No.1 -State) State Government has directed the appellant No.2 -Commissioner to consider registration under BH series only the motor vehicles owned by officer/staff of All India Service, Central Government employees and bank officers, leaving out private sector employees.
5. Learned Single Judge by impugned common order dtd. 16/12/2022 allowed the writ petitions quashing the communication dtd. 20/12/2021 issued by the appellant No.2 and further directed appellant No.2 to register the motor vehicles of the writ petitioners forthwith as per the notification dtd. 26/8/2021 under BH series and further directed the State Government to implement the Central Motor Vehicles (20th Amendment) Rules 2021. Being aggrieved by the said order appellants-State authorities are before this Court in these writ appeals.
6. Sri.S.Mahendra, learned Additional Government Advocate reiterating the grounds urged in the memorandum of appeals submitted that:
(i) State Government is empowered to collect taxes from the citizens owning vehicles and that notification dtd. 26/8/2021 issued by MORTH is coming in the way of appellants exercising their powers in collecting taxes as and when fell due;
(ii) That the levy and collection of taxes of motor vehicles is exclusively a State subject as per Entry 57 List II (State List) of VII Schedule of Constitution of India and that the said taxes are one of the modes of revenue generation for the State and any short fall would effect financial status of the State;
(iii) That MORTH has only issued a notification and has not enacted any law in this regard to implement the same in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxes Act and Rules. As such the State is well within the jurisdiction to exclude private employees from BH series registration;
(iv) That the exclusion of private employees from registering motor vehicles under BH series is based on comparative collection of taxes payable by the citizens for vehicles under BH series and if all vehicles owned by employees are registered under BH series there is every likelihood of decrease in collection of taxes;
(v) That private employees may not be permanent employees of the company where they are working and they can be employees on contract basis or can be hired for specific project or can be employees whose services are utilized temporarily to ensure the business continuity;
(vi) That infrastructure is yet to be developed to collect
The Central Government's notification and rules for BH series registration, along with the obligation of the State Government to implement them under Article 256 of the Constitution of India, formed ....
The Central Government has the power to make rules regarding vehicle registration under Sec. 64 of the MV Act, and the State Government cannot restrict compliance with the Central Motor Vehicles (Twe....
The Central Government can prescribe principles for vehicle taxation but lacks authority to set tax rates, which are within State jurisdiction.
The Central Government can prescribe principles for motor vehicle taxation, but the actual rates are within the exclusive domain of the States under the MV Act.
Motor Vehicle - Power/jurisdiction for assigning a new registration mark on a vehicle - Assignment of new registration mark but deem it proper to reiterate that if vehicle once registered in any Stat....
The State Government lacks the jurisdiction to levy fees for the mandatory replacement of old motor vehicle registration marks with new series numbers, as the exclusive power to regulate registration....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.