M. NAGAPRASANNA
PT. Bara Daya Energi India Private Limited Rep. By its Authorised Signatory Mr. Shivalingaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Department Of Energy Vidhana Soudha Bengaluru – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner-M/s PT Bara Daya Energi India Private Limited is before this Court calling in question a communication dated 08-12-2023 issued by the 2nd respondent/Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (‘the Corporation’ for short) conveying the reasons for holding the bid of the petitioner to be non-responsive.
2. Heard Sri S.Basavaraja, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Spoorthy Hegde, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri Ajay J.Nandalike, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
3. Facts adumbrated, are as follows:-
Consortium Of Titagarh Firema Adler S.P.A. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. v. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd.
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. v. Nair Coal Services Ltd.
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd.
Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India : (2012) 6 SCC 613
A subsidiary company can rely on the experience of its parent company and cannot be rejected solely for lacking its own experience. Penal provisions cannot be invoked against a subsidiary based on th....
Experience of a firm is not in its entirety attributable to each individual partner, but attributable only to the collective effort of all partners concerned.
Judicial review in tender matters is limited to evaluating the legality of the decision-making process, not the merits of the bids, requiring strict adherence to eligibility criteria.
The court upheld the validity of tender disqualification based on non-compliance with specified documentation requirements, affirming the decision-making integrity of the evaluation committee.
A change of name of a registered entity does not affect its legal existence, but failure to register correctly can invalidate tender submissions. Courts limit interventions in tender processes unless....
The court ruled that tender eligibility criteria must explicitly state disqualifications, allowing joint venture experience to be considered for bidder qualifications, ensuring clarity and fairness i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.