IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.Nagaprasanna, J.
Hemanthkumar N., S/o Nanyanaik - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha Bengaluru - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 24847 OF 2022 (GM-CC)
Decided On : 31-01-2023
Error - Caste categorization - RAM KUMAR GIJROYA v. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD, (2016) 4 SCC 754 - The court discussed the issue of caste categorization and the importance of caste certificates in the appointment process. It emphasized that a trivial error in caste categorization should not take away the right of a candidate for consideration of their case as a candidate belonging to a scheduled caste.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, belonging to Scheduled Caste, applied for a post but erroneously filled the application under the Scheduled Tribe category. Despite efforts to rectify the error, the Commission refused to make the correction, leading to the petitioner's exclusion from the select list.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's caste status was not in dispute, and the error in the application should not have resulted in the petitioner's exclusion from consideration for appointment.
Issues: The main issue was the refusal of the Commission to rectify the error in the petitioner's caste categorization, leading to the petitioner's exclusion from the select list.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the case of RAM KUMAR GIJROYA v. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD, emphasizing that a trivial error in caste categorization should not take away the right of a candidate for consideration of their case as a candidate belonging to a scheduled caste.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, issued a mandamus to rectify the error, and directed the Commission to treat the petitioner as belonging to Scheduled Caste and regulate the select list accordingly.
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question non- consideration of his candidature under SC, SC/KMS, SC/RL category owing to his name not being figured in the provisional select list dated 25-11-2022 published by the 2nd respondent/ Karnataka Public Service Commission (‘the Commission’ for short) for the post of Junior Assistant/Second Division Assistant. The petitioner further seeks a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to correct the error of the petitioner which is depicted as him belonging to Scheduled Tribe to that of Scheduled Caste.
2. Brief facts that lead the petitioner to this court in the subject petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
3. The merit list was then notified of the candidates who had come within the zone of consideration and the name of the petitioner did figure in the said merit list securing 163 marks. After the notification of the merit list, the petitioner was called for document verification on 8.09.1922. It was then the petitioner gets to know that his category has not been changed from Scheduled Tribe to Scheduled Caste and the error that had crept in online on 20.03.2020 had become part of the record. The petitioner then files an affidavit immediately before the Commission bringing to its notice that it was an error committed by the cyber centre but he does belong to Scheduled Caste and a certificate issued to him way back in the year 2013 certifying his caste. The Commission refused to accept the change.
4. The petitioner approaches the Karnataka State Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (‘SC/ST Commission’ for short) venting out his grievance that he would lose the opportunity of consideration of his candidature for appointment if he is not considered as belonging to Scheduled Caste. The SC/ST Commission also requests the 2nd respondent/Commission to consider the case of the petitioner. The petitioner then represented on 17-09- 2022 and 23-09-2022 with regard to the correction of error. All these did not yield any result. A provisional select list was notified on 25-11-2022 and the name of the petitioner did not figure in the said list ostensibly for the reason that the petitioner was treated as belonging to Scheduled Tribe and the posts reserved for Scheduled Tribe were minimal. It is then, the petitioner knocked at the doors of this Court in the subject petition calling in question the aforesaid action.
5. Heard Sri Bola Vedvyas Shenoy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Shwetha Krishnappa, learned Additional Government Advocate and Sri K.M.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2/Commission.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend with vehemence that it is an error on the part of the person who was uploading the application in cyber centre which missed the eye of the petitioner as it was uploaded depicting the petitioner to be belonging as Scheduled Tribe which in fact is an error and he does belong t
Ram Kumar Gijroya v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
Selected reserved category candidate qualifying written exam and producing valid category certificate at document verification cannot be denied appointment for expired certificate at application cut-....
Denial of Scheduled Caste status based on caste certificate format is unconstitutional under Article 14, violating rights protected by Section 73 of the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000.
The judgment established the principle that a person's OBC status is by birth and not by acquisition at a later stage, and certificates are an affirmation of existing status. It emphasized the import....
A fraudulent document is non est from the beginning and cannot be countenanced in law. A party to a litigation cannot approbate and reprobate from his stand taken before a quasi-judicial authority to....
The terms and conditions of the advertisement cannot be altered, and the mandatory nature of the instructions issued by the Commission must be strictly adhered to.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.