Back
V. SRISHANANDA
Mahesh H. C. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, By Begur Police Station, Chamarajanagara – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V Srishananda, J.
Heard Sri. B. V. Manje Gowda, learned counsel for Sri. Chandrshekara K.A., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. S. Vishwamurthy learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the records.
2. Present petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
3. The brief facts of the case are as under:
4. The gist of the complaint averments reve
Anticipatory bail can be granted when the allegations do not involve severe penalties, and the accused is required to cooperate with the investigation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in granting anticipatory bail, emphasizing the importance of the petitioner's cooperation with the Investigating Agency and ....
The absence of ingredients of a specific criminal offence and the need to balance apprehensions raised by the prosecution with the right of the accused to seek anticipatory bail.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on lack of specific overt acts or allegations against the petitioners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
