SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 255

E. S. INDIRESH
Uttam – Appellant
Versus
Dattatreya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri. D P Ambekar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by the defendant No.2 and 4 challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 11.07.2019 passed in R.A.No.53 of 2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Indi, Vijayapura District, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 01.10.2016 in O.S.No.313 of 2009 on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC, Indi, holding that the plaintiffs No.1 to 4 are entitled for 1/5th share each in respect of suit lands.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal shall be referred to in terms of their status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. The plaint averments are that plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are the children of defendant No.1 and plaintiff No.4. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the suit schedule properties are the ancestral properties of plaintiffs. It is further stated that, the contesting defendants No.2 and 3 who are the brother and sister of defendant No.1, got entered their names in the record of rights. It is also stated that the defendant No.4 also managed to get enter his name in the record of rights and feeling aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs have filed suit in O.S. No.313 of 2009 seeking relief of partition and separate possession in respec

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top