SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, S RACHAIAH
Abdul Samad @ Samad S/O. Abdul Ajeej Sab – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka By Ramanagara Town Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S RACHAIAH, J.
1. These three appeals arise out of the judgment of conviction dated 11.12.2017 and order on sentence dated 12.12.2017 in S.C No.35/2015 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge at Ramanagara for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 506, 302 r/w 149 of IPC and Sections 25(1-B) of Arms Act, 1959.
2. The ranks of the parties in the Trial Court will be considered henceforth for convenience.
Brief facts of the case:
3. It is the case of the prosecution that the brother of Nizam Pasha lodged a complaint stating that he had received a message on 13.01.2015 around 3.45 p.m., that his brother was being assaulted by unknown persons near KEB office. Immediately, he went to the place of occurrence and saw his brother lying on the ground with severe bleeding injuries on all over the body. On enquiry, he came to know that Samad and others assaulted his brother and ran away from the spot. Immediately, the injured was taken to the hospital in an auto-rickshaw, but, he succumbed to the said injuries. Therefore, he lodged a complaint against accused No.1 and others.
4. The jurisdictional police registered a case in Crime No.10/2015 for the offences under
C.Muniyappan And Others V. State Of Tamil Nadu
The court affirmed that related witnesses' testimony is admissible if credible, and chance witnesses' accounts require careful scrutiny but can also support a conviction.
The court affirmed that all members of an unlawful assembly are liable for actions taken in support of their common objective, showcasing the interplay between direct and circumstantial evidence in e....
When evidence of eye-witnesses are not trust worthy to believe, then motive place an important role to prove guilt of accused.
Point of law: Every person who witnesses a murder reacts in his own way. Some are stunned, become speechless and stand rooted to the spot. Some become hysteric and start wailing. Some start shouting ....
Conviction for murder under Section 302 established through credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, despite minor inconsistencies and investigation delays.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the testimony of witnesses, even if related to the deceased, should not be automatically discarded, and minor discrepancies in the evidence sh....
Conviction upheld for murder based on reliable eyewitness testimony, establishing collective intent under IPC sections, while addressing proper charge framing and witness credibility.
Point of Law : When there are eyewitnesses to prove the charge, failure on the part of the prosecution to establish every link in the chain of circumstance would become irrelevant.
The testimony of an injured witness is highly reliable and can form the basis for conviction, especially when corroborated by other eyewitnesses and medical evidence.
Conviction based solely on testimonies of related witnesses is unsafe without independent corroboration, as evidenced by inconsistencies and lack of physical evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.