M. NAGAPRASANNA
Subhalakshmi N. , W/o Maniyan Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioners, both doctors, are before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.1938 of 2024 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Traffic Court-I, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, pursuant to a complaint initiated by the 1st respondent under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C., alleging offences under Sections 20(1), (2), (3) and 23(1) and (2) of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
Both the petitioners are doctors. The 1st petitioner is the proprietor of the Diagnostic Centre in the name and style of ‘Medizone Medical Centre’ (the Centre’ for short). The 2nd petitioner is a certified registered operator of the ultrasound machine at the Diagnostic Centre. It is the averment in the petition that the ultrasound diagnostic procedures are conducted at the centre between 10.30 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. and between 6.00 p.m. and 7.00 p.m. on the prescription of doctors who direct a test to be conducted upon the patients. When things stood thus, the 1st respondent/Appropriate Authority under the Act, on receipt of certain information, conduct an inspection at 4.0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.