K. NATARAJAN
KAWAL JEET KAUR W/O JANG BAHADUR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner/RC holder of the vehicle under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for setting aside the order passed by the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapura dated 10.07.2024 in Crl. Misc. No. 981/2024, having dismissed the application under Section 457 of Cr.P.C. and release the vehicle, which was seized by the Excise Range Office in Crime No. 105/2023-24/1006IE/100606 for offences punishable under Sections 15(c), 18(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 25, 61, 8(b), 8(c) of NDPS Act.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the owner of the goods container vehicle bearing registration No. RJ-14/GG-4191 and he is engaged in the profession of transportation of goods from different parts of the country and the vehicle in question was hired by the Royal India Roadways for transportation of garments. Accordingly, garments were sent along with 12 invoices from Ludhiana, Panjab to Tripura and Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. When the vehicle was passing near the jurisdiction of Shiradon check post, the vehicle was intercepted and on verification, the Excise Inspector found 10
The court established that the Special Court has the authority to grant interim custody of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act if the owner proves lack of knowledge of its use for illegal activities.
Release of vehicle - In the absence of procedure evolved for release of vehicle also, the matter has to be considered by the Larger Bench. In the case on hand, the question involved is in respect of ....
Interim custody of a seized vehicle under NDPS is justified if the owner proves no knowledge or involvement in illegal acts, respecting natural justice.
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
The court reaffirmed that the jurisdiction to grant interim custody of vehicles seized under NDPS Act lies with the Special Court, ensuring owners' rights are protected during proceedings.
A true vehicle owner not implicated in a narcotics crime is entitled to interim custody of their vehicle pending trial, emphasizing procedural fairness and rights under statutory law.
Ownership rights must be acknowledged in interim custody claims of seized vehicles under the NDPS Act, especially when no charges are laid against the owner.
The court emphasized that the ownership of seized vehicles cannot be ignored and must be adjudicated by a Special Court to ensure fairness and justice.
Car owners, not charged in drug cases, may have vehicles returned unless shown knowledge or involvement in crimes.
There is no specific bar/restriction under provisions of NDPS Act for return of any seized vehicle used for transporting narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in interim, pending disposal of crimin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.