SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1398

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Ummer Farooq – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Central Tax – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shreehari Kutsa
For the Respondents: Jeevan J. Neeralgi

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 08.12.2022 [Annexure-D] issued under Section 29 [2][a] of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, 'CGST Act'] canceling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner has alleged inter alia that the impugned order of cancellation is in violation of principles of natural justice. As such, Sri. Shreehari Kutsa, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. Jeevan J Neeralgi, the learned counsel for the respondents, are heard for final disposal of the petition.

2. The first respondent has issued notice dated 26.10.2022 informing the petitioner that the petitioner has availed input tax credit for different transactions with entities as mentioned in such notice but the registration of such entities have been either cancelled or suspended and hence, the petitioner must furnish documents in support of the input tax credit. The respondent has afforded five days to file such documents. On 01.11.2022, the first respondent has issued Show Cause Notice for cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner, on receipt of such Show Cause Notice, has appeared before the first respondent and sought for tim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top