IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B.M. Shyam Prasad, J.
Rangappa Krishnappa – Petitioner
Versus
Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 6637 of 2023
Decided On : 31-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of registration and failure to respond (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's inability to attend due to health issues (Para 3) |
| 3. opportunity for hearing based on bona fides (Para 4) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner's registration is cancelled by the impugned order dated 19.04.2022 [Annexure-B] under Section 29 [3] of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner's primary grievance both before this Court and the first appellate Authority is inability to avail the opportunity of hearing extended for bonafide reasons. The petitioner asserts that the impugned order is in violation of the principles of natural justice. Sri. G Nataraj, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. Jeevan J Neeralgi, the learned counsel for the respondents, are heard for final disposal in the light of this grievance.
2. The petitioner is indeed served with the Show Cause Notice dated 05.04.2022 but has not responded to this Notice. The third respondent has cancelled the registration by the impugned order on 19.04.2022 recording that the petitioner has filed response on 17.04.2022 and upon consideration of the reply and the submissions made at the time of personal hearing, is of the opinion that the registration must be cancelled. Thus, reason for cancellation of registration is the failure to file returns.
3. The petitioner has preferred first appeal contending that the petitioner has filed response but could not appear for personal hearing because he was suffering from lungs disease and was advised bed rest which had a cascading effect on his business including the failure to file monthly returns. The petitioner's appeal is rejected on the ground of limitation.
4. If the petitioner can demonstrate bonafides, there would be no need to take a pedantic approach. The reasons assigned by the petitioner could be bonafide and the petitioner must have another opportunity of hearing to establish the same. The third respondent will therefore have to necessarily extend an opportunity and consider the circumstances that are relied upon by the petitioner. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER:
The petition is allowed in part, setting aside the cancellation order dated 19.04.2022 [Annexure-B] restoring the proceedings to the third respondent for reconsideration in the light of this Court's observation. The petitioner without further notice shall appear before the third respondent on 19.04.2023.
The importance of providing detailed reasons for cancellation of registration and the need for compliance with the principles of natural justice.
The cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of specific details in the show-cause notice and impugned order.
Orders lacking reasoning do not meet constitutional scrutiny under Article 14, allowing for judicial review and the right to respond to show cause notices.
Cancellation of GST registrations requires adherence to statutory procedures and principles of natural justice; vague show cause notices render cancellation invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.