SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1375

C M JOSHI
Divisional Manager – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Govinda Naidu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Rajashekhar S Arani, Advocate
For the Respondent:Smt. Soubhagya Vakkund, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

C M Joshi, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 11.03.2010 in MVC No.756/2007 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal IX, Ballari (for short "the Tribunal"). The insurance company aggrieved by the said judgment and award has approached this Court in appeal.

2. The parties are referred to as per their ranks before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

    The petitioner before the Tribunal contended that on 06.04.2007 while he was going by walk towards KSRTC Bus depot, at about 4.30 p.m., the rider of the motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-34/J-523 came from hind side of the petitioner and dashed him causing injuries and he was taken to VIMS hospital, Ballari where he took treatment as an inpatient. The said motorcycle belonged to respondent No.2 before the Tribunal and it was duly insured by the respondent No.3- insurance company. The petitioner claimed compensation of Rs.8,00,000/-.

After service of notice to respondents, respondents 1 to 3 appeared before the Tribunal. Respondents 1 and 2 did not file their written statement however, respondent No.3-insurance company filed its written

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top