SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ANU SIVARAMAN, K. MANMADHA RAO, JJ.
K. Suresh Babu S/o Late Konda Deva Bhushnam - Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) No. 7 of 2025
Decided On : 08-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kanishk Ravindran
For the Respondent: P. Thejesh

A writ of habeas corpus cannot be granted when there is no evidence of illegal detention or negligence by authorities in seeking a missing individual, especially with a history of mental illness.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Habeas Corpus - The petitioner sought habeas corpus for the production of his wife, who was missing after alleged unlawful confinement by family members during psychiatric treatment. The court found no evidence of illegal detention by police or awareness of the wife's whereabouts by respondents. (Paras 1, 6, 13)

(B) Medical Negligence - The court acknowledged the petitioner’s claims regarding inadequate treatment and release of the wife from the hospital without proper care, impeding her recovery due to mental illness. However, it does not establish direct liability on the hospital or police for her disappearance. (Paras 8, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claimed his wife was unlawfully confined during mental treatment, went missing post-police involvement, and accused police of negligence in locating her despite the allegations of domestic violence being unsubstantiated. (Paras 4, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court emphasized there was no direct accusation of the police detaining the wife and noted ongoing efforts by them to locate her. No merit was found in claims of negligence that would warrant issuing a writ. (Paras 13, 15)

Issues: The primary question was whether the police unlawfully detained the petitioner's wife and were negligent in failing to trace her, despite her mental health challenges. (Paras 7, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the husband presented no credible evidence of detention or negligence by police, ruling that the wife was missing of her own accord and that the police had been diligent in their search efforts. (Paras 13, 14)

Result: Writ Petition closed, directing police to continue efforts in tracing the petitioner’s wife.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for habeas corpus regarding wife's disappearance. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8)
2. petition seeks legal remedy for wife's production. (Para 2)
3. claims of negligence and police inaction. (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
4. court analysis of police efforts and wife's mental condition. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. closure of writ petition with direction to police for tracing. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

ANU SIVARAMAN, J.

1. The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to respondents No.2 to 7 to produce the wife of the petitioner named Smt. Vijaya Shanthi before this Court and handover her to him.

2. We have heard Shri. Kanishk Ravindran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri. P. Thejesh, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner and his wife were lawfully wedded and their marriage was solemnized in accordance with Christian marriage rites on 19.05.2016. The petitioner, his wife and 2 children are residents of Kolar and Bengaluru. The petitioner's wife was mentally ill having high risk behavior, impaired judgment, self-harming, impulsive behavior and depression and she was diagnosed with:

i) Recurrent Depressive Disorder, Moderate Depression with Somatic Syndrome.

ii) Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, Impulsive Type.

4. It is also submitted that Keethavanan, along with his family members had allegedly abducted and wrongfully confined the petitioner's wife while she was undergoing treatment for mental illness. This case is pending under trial before II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar Gold Fields.

5. It is further submitted that while returning from routine psychiatric consultation on 4th July, 2023 she jumped off the bike and ran into Viveknagar Police Station, alleging domestic violence and upon investigation no signs of domestic violence was found. On the same day, she was admitted to the Female General Psychiatry Ward at St.John's Hospital and was discharged on 6th July, 2023. She ran from the hospital gate to the Emergency Department but the petitioner was denied re-admission by the Medical Social Worker, who directed the petitioner to return in the morning. She was later found roaming near the hospital canteen in the midnight and went missing when the petitioner went to fetch his bike.

6. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner's wife did not receive appropriate treatment and counseling during in-patient psychiatry admission and there was medical negligence on the part of the hospital and that the Medical Social Worker let her out in the midnight without proper attention and care knowing about her mental condition.

7. It is further submitted that the Hoysala Police located her at a nearby hostel and took both of them to the Viveknagar Police Station at around 2:00 AM. Despite informing police about his wife's mental condition the petitioner was detained, his phone and belongings were confiscated. The petitioner's wife was escorted away by a male constable at 3:30 AM and she never returned from then. A missing complaint was filed on 8th July,2023 and a WPHC No.82/2023 was filed before this Court on 18th August, 2023. It is contended that the Police submitted a false Status Report misleading the Court that the wife had eloped. The Writ Petition was closed on 04.09.2023, keeping in view of the history of the petitioner wife's conduct of being eloped twice with a person by name Keethavanan and with liberty to file a fresh petition based on the investigation.

8. It is further submitted that the petitioner searched extensively across multiple locations in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, including St. John's Hospital but could not trace her whereabouts for the past 18 months and could not get any assistance from the police. The petitioner submits that the children's education and mental we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top