UMESH A. TRIVEDI, CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Ashaben Kishorbhai Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI)
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing respondent police authorities to produce the corpus i.e. husband of the petitioner who is missing since last about 7 months according to the petitioner.
2. While praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a copy of application addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Kachchh at Bhuj dated 03.01.2024 from Bhavnagar by the petitioner wife stating that on 07.07.2023 her husband went missing from gate of Mundra Port. It is further asserted that despite Mundra Police being informed and telephoned repeatedly, they have not inquired into it. She has raised suspicion that they have not inquired whether he is alive or dead. She has complained about Mundra Police not providing any assistance to her.
3. When petition came up for hearing, we asked Mr. Das, learned advocate for the petitioner whether in absence of any assertion, either in her application made to the police or in the petition with regard to any illegal confinement of her husband by anyone, can this Court entertain a petition seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus or no
Alsia Pardhi v. State of MP and Others
Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K. M. and Others
Union of India v. Yumnam Anand M. @ Bocha @ Kora @ Suraj and Another, reported in (2007) 10 SCC 190
A Writ of Habeas Corpus cannot be issued without evidence of illegal confinement, even in cases of missing persons.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.