IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
R.M. Manjunath Gowda S/o Ramappa Gowda - Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement Ministry of Finance and Department of Revenue - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 7473 of 2025
Decided On : 02-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking bail in money laundering case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accused involved in multiple firs linked to money laundering. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for bail grounded on lack of evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. definition and punishment for money laundering outlined. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. conditions for bail under pmla explained. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court's application of mind for bail. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. presumption under section 24 requires foundational facts. (Para 16 , 19) |
| 8. reviewing predicate offences in relation to bail. (Para 17 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. no distinct criminality since last fir. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 10. value of co-accused's confession in bail hearings. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. bail granted due to remoteness of trial and health of petitioner. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
1. Accused in ECIR/BGO/05/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short 'the Act') pending before the Court of Prl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, is before this Court in this petition filed under Section 4 39 of Cr.PC seeking regular bail.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
3. Petitioner was the elected President of Shivamogga District Co-operative Central Bank, Shivamogga (for short 'SDCC Bank') during the years 1997-1998, 1999-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2020. FIR in Crime No.325/2014 was registered by Doddapete Police Station, Shivamogga, against B.Shobha - Branch Manager of SDCC Bank and others for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 408, 409, 420, 34 of IPC, and in the said case, petitioner was arrayed as accused no.15 in the FIR. Subsequently, the case was transferred to CID for further investigation. After completing investigation in the said case, charge sheet was filed for the offences punishable under Sections 409 , 420, 465, 471, 120B, 201 read with 37 of IPC. However, petitioner was dropped in the said charge sheet. Subsequently, FIR in Crime No.16/2021 was registered by Jayanagar Police Station, Shivamogga, against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 168, 200, 403, 405, 409, 418, 419, 420, 424, 425, 427, 467, 468, 474 read with 34 of IPC and Section 109 of the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959. After registration of FIR in Crime No.16/2021, additional charge sheet was filed in Crime No.325/2014 against the petitioner on 30.07.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 409 , 202 read with 36 of IPC.
4. FIR in Crime No.4/2014 was registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 13 (1)(e) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'P.C. Act') and after completing investigation in the said case, charge sheet has been already filed against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences. It is in this background, ECIR/BGO/05/2021 was registered against the petitioner by the respondent alleging that proceeds of crime in the aforesaid criminal cases was utilized directly or indirectly by the petitioner for the purpose of deriving/obtaining property. In the said proceedings, petitioner was arrested on 09.04.2025 and subsequently remanded to judicial custody. His bail application filed before the Special Court in ECIR/BGO/05/2021, was rejected on 20.05.2025. Therefore, petitioner is before this Court.
5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in Crime No.325/2014 which was registered for the schedule offences, after investigation, no charge sheet was filed initially against the petitioner. On the very same allegations, FIR in Crime No.16/2021 was registered by Jayanagar Police Station, Shivamogga, and the said FIR was quashed by this Court in W.P.No.8294/2021 on the ground that the allegations made in Crime No.325/2014 and Crime No.16/2021 and the period during which the alleged offences were committed were one and the same. Though additional charge sheet has been filed in Crime No.325/2014 against the petitioner, in the
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Others Vs. Union of India & Others
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Union of India through the Assistant Director Vs. Kanhaiya Prasad
Prem Prakash Vs. Union of India through The Directorate of Enforcement
Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra
Arvind Kejriwal Vs. Directorate of Enforcement
P. Krishna Mohan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Kashmira Singh Vs. State of M.P.
V. Senthil Balaji v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
AI
Bail can be granted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act if foundational facts are not established, emphasizing the need for strong evidence before presumption of guilt arises.
To establish a money laundering offence, foundational facts must be proven, including involvement with 'proceeds of crime' and clear evidence against the accused. Bail granted due to lack of evidence....
(1) Money Laundering – Right to life and personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of Constitution is overarching and sacrosanct – Constitutional Court cannot be restrained from granting bail to ac....
The court ruled that in economic offenses, particularly money laundering, anticipatory bail is rarely granted due to the grave nature of allegations and potential interference with investigations.
The offence of money laundering under the PMLA is independent, and involvement in proceeds of crime suffices for liability; stringent conditions for bail must be met.
Economic offences like money laundering under the PMLA warrant severe scrutiny for bail, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial while recognizing the gravity of the allegations and prolonged detenti....
Accused in money laundering must meet stringent bail conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA, reflecting the severity of the offense and impact on ongoing investigations.
The offence of money laundering under PMLA is independent of underlying scheduled offences; involvement in any process related to proceeds of crime suffices for liability under Section 3.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.