SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Sunil Yadav, old son of Pashupati Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
B.A. No. 11102 of 2023
Decided on : 12-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Shiva Pande, Advocate, Mr. Yash Badkur, Advocate, Mr. Shreyas Kaushal, Advocate, Ms. Sneh Singh, Advocate, Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Kumar, Addl. SGI, Mrs. Chandana Kumari, AC to Addl. SGI, Mr. Priyanshu Shekhar, AC to Addl. SGI

The offence of money laundering under PMLA is independent of underlying scheduled offences; involvement in any process related to proceeds of crime suffices for liability under Section 3.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3 and 4 - Application for bail filed under Section 439 and 440 of the CrPC - Accused involved in illegal mining and laundering proceeds of crime through various transactions - Petitioner alleged to have directly facilitated illegal activities, with investigation revealing cash transactions over Rs. 20 crores and close association with prime accused - Multiple FIRs consolidated under ECIR show destruction of evidence and furtherance of illegal activities. (Paras 1-96)

(B) Money Laundering - Definition and implications - Clarification that 'proceeds of crime' may include property derived from criminal activity related to scheduled offences - Burden of proof lies on the accused to establish innocence - Court emphasizes seriousness and systemic threat of economic crimes - Increased scrutiny required in such cases when considering bail applications. (Paras 1, 10, 60)

(C) Bail - Presumption against grant in economic offences - Court determines that petitioner fails to provide sufficient grounds for bail; the gravity of allegations and links to ongoing criminal activity weigh against release - Arguments of parity found inadequate due to distinguishing facts. (Paras 67, 92, 94)

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks bail under pmla. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal reasoning for denial of bail in economic offenses. (Para 7)
4. detailed analysis of the law and provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
5. court's reasoning concerning money laundering laws. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
6. final order denying bail based on evidence. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97)

JUDGMENT :

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.

Prayer:

1. The instant application has been filed under Section 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for grant of bail in connection with Case No. ECIR-04/2022, registered under Section 3 punishable under Section 4 of PML Act, 2022.

Factual Matrix of the Case:

2. The prosecution story in brief as per the allegation made in the instant ECIR/complaint reads as under:

The case of prosecution in brief is that the investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was initiated by recording an ECIR bearing no. 3/2022 based on the FIR no. 85/2020 dt. 22.06.2020 of one Sambhu Nandan Kumar at Barharwa Police Station, Distt-Sahebganj, Jharkhand against accused Pankaj Mishra and others. It is alleged that the accused persons threatened the above complainant over the phone not to participate in the tender of Barharwa Toll, and on the refusal of which the complainant was attacked by a mob, on the behest of the accused persons. Subsequently, the charge sheet no. 231/2020 dated 30.11.2020 was filed in the court at Rajmahal, Distt Sahebganj. Further, the agency took several other FIRs related to the matter along with the above case to investigate the instant case.

It was revealed during the investigation that the vehicles carrying the mined items (Mainly stone chips) had to cross Barharwa Toll before reaching the main roads. It was also revealed that apart from mining under valid licenses, a vast quantity of mining is being carried out illegally in Sahibganj District and adjoining areas. It also revealed that the accused person, Pankaj Mishra, is involved in the illegal collection of levies from the trucks carrying stone chips through his accomplices and also has control over the mining of stone chips and boulders as well as installation and operations of several crushers, set up across various mining sites in Sahebganj district. He has a fixed share in almost all the mines and transportation by several persons, including his associates. He enjoys political clout, being the representative of the Chief Minister, Jharkhand, who is also an MLA from Barhait, Sahebganj. The investigation into the bank accounts reveals the acquisition of proceeds of crime running into crores of rupees.

It is stated that to unearth the larger picture, the Enforcement Directorate has merged the other FIRs who were lodged against the accused Pankaj Mishra, related to illegal mining into existing ECIR. Further, the issue of illegal mining & damage to the environment is also being investigated considering the observation of the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal (NGT), New Delhi given in the matter and various FIRs registered related to the issue of illegal mining. It is further alleged that apart from mining under valid license, a huge quantity of mining is being carried out illegally in Sahibganj District and adjoining areas and the accused Pankaj Mishra is involved in illegal collection of levies from the trucks carrying stone chips through his accomplices. It is further, alleged that total cash amounting to Rs. 5,34,44,400/- was recovered from accomplices as well as close associates of the prime accused Panka

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top