Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Slv Saw Mills And Wood Industries – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks writ of certiorari. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner’s history and land development issues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. cancellation of allotment due to non-payment. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments regarding infrastructure obligations. (Para 16) |
| 5. defendant's contentions regarding delay in action. (Para 18) |
| 6. prior rulings on equitable estoppel. (Para 21) |
| 7. court clarifies novation in contract terms. (Para 30) |
| 8. court found kiadb's cancellation justified. (Para 31) |
| 9. conclusion: writ petition dismissed. (Para 32) |
ORDER :
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. A writ of certiorari or any other writ quashing the impugned cancellation letters bearing no. IADB/HO/ALLOT/AS/18578/4595/15-16 dated 6th July 2015 (Annexure-N) and No. IADB/HO/ALLOT/AS/18578/12776/15-16 dated 11th December 2015 (Annexure-V)
ii. Direction to the R1 to restore the allotment of 6 acres as per letter bearing No. IADB/HO/ALLOT/AS-2/18578/1114/09-10 dated 14th December 2009 (Annexure-C) on the terms and conditions as mentioned in the said Allotment Letter.
iii. As a consequence of the above, declare that any lease cum
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
