Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S.INDIRESH
Richards S.J. S/o Late R.H. Jayanathan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 13.03.2023 passed in R.P.No.166/2016-17 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that, one Peter David was the absolute owner in possession of the land to an extent of 2 acres in Sy.No.2 of Bikashipura village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk as per the registered Sale Deed dated 10.10.1957. It is also stated that, pursuant to the execution of the registered Sale Deed dated 10.10.1957, the revenue records stands in the name of Sri. Peter David. It is stated that, the petitioner herein is the legal heir to Peter David as the said Peter David, was a bachelor. It is also stated that, the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and one Smt. Grace Vinodini claiming as predecessor of late P.S.Chinnappa and Smt. D.A.Sumithra, jointly acquired the land measuring 103 acres 19 guntas in Sy.No.1, 2 and 8 of Bikashpura village as per the registered Sale Deed dated 30.11.1954 and thereafter, the land was sold in favour of one Ranga Rao, Chief Secretary of Government of Mysore as per registered Sale Deed dated 21.03.1935 and same was prior to the Sale Deed dated 30.11.1954. It is also stat
The court emphasized that competing property claims must be resolved through careful examination of relevant Sale Deeds and proper adjudication procedures, ensuring all parties have opportunities to ....
The court emphasized that revenue authorities must not alter land records without clear evidence of title, especially when prior claims have been dismissed.
The court emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements and the principle of natural justice in amending entries in the Record of Rights, ruling that the respondent acted without juri....
The court ruled that orders affecting rights must not be made without providing notice and opportunity to the affected party, emphasizing the principles of natural justice.
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes in mutation cases; established rights remain intact despite challenges.
The dismissal of suits filed by the respondents influenced the court's decision to quash the order staying the mutation entry in favor of the petitioner.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
