Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Maruthambal – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer, Karur – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner challenges the order of the first respondent dated 10.02.2021.
2. I have heard Mr.A.N.Ramanathan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Kameswaran, learned Government Advocate, for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.M.P.Senthil, learned counsel for the respondents 3 and 4. I have also gone through the records, including the impugned order.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the lands comprised in S.F.No.384/1 to an extent of 36 cents, Keelapaguthi Village, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District, belonged to one Varatha Reddiyar and his wife Veerammal, who have purchased the total extent of 8.57 Acres from one Jamindhar K.K.Muthaiah, by way of registered sale deed dated 16.08.1960. The said Varatha Reddiyar and his wife Veerammal, sold 2.48 Acres to one Mohamed Hanifa by way of registered sale deed dated 31.12.1960, who in turn sold the said lands to one A.Periyasamy, S/o.Andiyappa Pandithar in any by registered sale deed dated 30.01.1961. The said A.Periyasamy mutated UDR patta and other revenue records in his name. The petitioner's father's whose name, is also Periyasamy, S/o.Thirumudiyapillai, purchased 36 cents in S.F.No. 384/1 from A.Periyasamy vide sale deed da
The court emphasized that revenue authorities must not alter land records without clear evidence of title, especially when prior claims have been dismissed.
Revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to resolve title disputes, directing parties to civil court for adjudication.
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes and must direct parties to seek relief in civil court.
Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes; they assess claims based on prima facie evidence. The petitioner failed to substantiate her claim, leading to the dismissal of her petition.
The rejection of a patta application by a quasi-judicial authority is perverse when it disregards credible evidence and established legal procedures, warranting the intervention of higher courts.
The plaintiffs failed to prove ownership and possession of the land, leading to the dismissal of their suit for alteration of revenue records.
The court emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements and the principle of natural justice in amending entries in the Record of Rights, ruling that the respondent acted without juri....
Revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to resolve title disputes and must refer such matters to civil courts for adjudication.
The court emphasized that competing property claims must be resolved through careful examination of relevant Sale Deeds and proper adjudication procedures, ensuring all parties have opportunities to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
