Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Manikantha V.K. S/o V.L. Krishnaraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. description of the complaint and allegations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on the legal framework regarding abetment of suicide. (Para 6) |
| 4. analysis of previous relevant case law. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
1. Both these petitions arise out of the impugned proceedings in Crime No.187/2024 registered by the respondent-Bylakuppe Police against the petitioners herein and other accused persons for the offence punishable under Sections 108 read with 3(5) of BNS Act, 2023, which is currently pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Periyapatna, Mysuru District.
2. Heard the learned Counsels appearing for both the petitioners, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.
3. Respondent No.2 having been served with notice of the petition, has chosen to remain unrepresented and has not contested the petition.
4. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.2-defacto complainant is the cousin brother of one deceased-Suresha and Smt.Pallavi is the wife of said Suresha, pursuant to whose demise, respondent No.2 filed the instant complaint d
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
