IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K. V. ARAVIND J, N.V. ANJARIA, CJ
Chetan S/o D. Shankarappa – Appellant
Versus
P.V. Kalpana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.V. ARAVIND, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. B.N. Mahesh Chandra for learned Advocate Mr. G.S. Naveen for the appellant, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Jayakumar S. Patil a/w learned Advocate Smt. N. Sharadha for respondent No.1, learned Advocate Mr. T.L. Kiran Kumar for respondent No.3, learned Government Advocate Mr. K.S. Harish for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and learned Advocate Mr. H. H. Shivamogga Nagaraj for respondent No.6.
2. Respondent No. 6 in Writ Petition No. 7893 of 2024 has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 16th July2024.
3. The brief facts are that the election for the post of Treasurer to the Board of Directors of the Bangalore Advocates Co-operative Society Limited was notified through the issuance of a calendar of events. Both the appellant and Respondent No. 1 filed their respective nominations to contest for the position of Treasurer. However, the Returning Officer rejected nomination of Respondent No.1 on the grounds that one of the proposers had nominated more than one candidate. As the appellant was the only candidate, the election for the post of Treasurer was declared unanimous.
4. Respondent No. 1 challenged the endorsement in t
Gujarath University vs. N.U. Rajguru and another
Umesh Ambi vs. Angadi Shekara Basappa
Eera through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
The High Court retains jurisdiction under Article 226 to address disputes involving pure legal questions regarding statutory interpretation, despite the availability of alternative remedies under the....
Any dispute arising in connection with the election of any officer of the society has to be adjudicated by the Registrar, and an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to ....
The availability of an alternative remedy under the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001, and the proviso under Section 58(2)(c) of the Act.
The court held that non-attendance at meetings due to COVID-19 restrictions should not disqualify members from voting, affirming that disputes about eligibility typically fall under statutory provisi....
The election jurisprudence, its principles and the applicability of election laws have different delineations and dimensions. They indeed operate, and has to be allowed to operate in their own way so....
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 8(7)(a) of the Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995, which mandates drawing lots and decla....
The acceptance of a nomination paper must adhere to statutory provisions, and disqualification under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is self-operative, allowing for judicial intervention in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.