Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V.HOSMANI
Solarone Energy Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for regulatory compliance. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. cerc's orders on connectivity and compliance timelines. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. extension of project deadlines by cerc. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial functions require consideration of economic impact. (Para 13 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. efficacy of remedies must be exhausted. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed for non-exhaustion of remedies. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
ORDER :
RAVI V. HOSMANI, J.
This writ petition is filed seeking for following reliefs:
i) Issue a writ, order or direction, more in nature of writ or Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order quashing/setting aside to the extent challenged in the present Writ Petition, the common order dated 21.04.2024 in Petition no.291/MP/2023 and petition no.292/MP/2023 read with common order dated 30.03.2025 dated in Petition no.305/MP/2024 and 3-6/MP/2024 at Annexures-A and B,
ii) Issue writ order or direction more than in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, or order directing respondent No.1 to permit the petitioners to utilise the connectivity granted by the Respondent no.2 by way of letters dated 06.06.2022 and 14.06.2022 at
Writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for petitioners who have not exhausted available alternative remedies, reinforcing procedural propriety in electricity regulation cases.
The regulatory authority's ability to grant extensions for compliance is limited by previous orders, with no responsibility negated by delays caused by other parties.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
