2025 Supreme(Kar) 1261
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, S.G. PANDIT, JJ.
Sports Authority Of India, Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium, Rep. By Its Director General, Mr. Injeti Srinivas and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Mrs. Sultana Razia, Since Dead By Lrs.- Qamer Khader Husain, (H/O. Late Sultana Razia, S/o Abdul Wahab) and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1671 of 2017 (S-CAT)
Decided On : 04-09-2025
For the Petitioners:Sri. M.C. Thimmaiah for Sri. Joshua Hudson Samuel, Advocate
For the Respondents:Sri. Ranganath S. Jois, Advocate, Sri. K. Chandra Mohan, Advocate.
In absence of defined hierarchy, financial upgradation under ACP scheme entitles an employee only to the next higher pay scale, not to a significantly higher one.
Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 - Applicants entitled to financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme - The Tribunal granted higher pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 with retrospective effect upon completion of service - The court found no defined hierarchy in the post of Assistant Librarian; thus, the applicant was entitled to the next immediate higher pay scale only. (Paras 22, 29, 31)
(B) Judicial Review - The jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to scrutinizing the legality of the lower authority's decision and not to ascertain its correctness. (Paras 21, 30)
Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal which allowed the respondent's application for a higher pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 based on her claim of hierarchical entitlement after 24 years of service.
Findings of Court:
The court affirmed that the Assistant Librarian's post lacked a defined promotional hierarchy which ruled out entitlement for a higher pay scale under the ACP scheme.
Issues: Whether the respondent's position as Assistant Librarian warranted a higher grade under ACP based on hierarchical claims?
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the existence of no defined hierarchy in the position of Assistant Librarian negates the respondent's claim for a higher pay scale, emphasizing adherence to the stipulations set forth in the ACP scheme.
Result: Writ petition allowed; the Tribunal’s order quashed.
ORDER :
JAYANT BANERJI, J.
Heard Sri.M.C.Thimmaiah, learned counsel holding brief for Sri.Joshua Hudson Samuel learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Ranganath S Jois, learned counsel appearing for the legal representatives of respondent No.1 i.e. Respondent No.1(A to C) as well as Sri.K.Chandra Mohan, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners- Sports Authority of India and others have challenged the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench (for short “Tribunal”) in O.A.No.324/2013. By the impugned order, the O.A. was allowed and the petitioners were directed to place the applicant in the pay-scale of Rs.8000 – 13500 with effect from the date when she completed 24 years of service with consequential benefits. The petitioners were also directed to pass such order, within a period of three months on receiving a copy of the order.
3. From the record of this petition, it appears that the respondent no.1, [respondent] was initially appointed as Library Assistant- cum-Clerk on 05.04.1978 and she was promoted to the post of Assistant Librarian on 31.03.1986. She filed O.A.No.359/2006 seeking a direction to the petitioners to grant her pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 with effect from 01.01.1996 in accordance with the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, [CCS (RP) Rules 1997] and all consequential benefits including the arrears of pay and allowances. By an order dated 20.06.2007, O.A.No.359/2006 was disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent therein to take a decision in the pending matter, and that if a decision was taken in favour of the applicant, it would have retrospective effect from 01.01.1996. On an Office Order No.226/2008 dated 10.11.2008 being passed by the petitioner, fixing pay of the respondent as per recommendation of 6th Pay Commission, the respondent filed O.A.No.129/2009 before the CAT seeking quashing of that Office Order. In that O.A., a memo was filed by the petitioner enclosing an Office Order of 15.02.2010, pursuant to which the O.A. was closed as infructuous. Thereafter, after 19 months the respondent submitted a representation dated 19.12.2011 and another on 16.07.2012, seeking financial upgradation under ACP scheme having regard to the hierarchy of the posts. By means of a reply dated 27.07.2012, the representation was rejected. The aforesaid reply dated 27.07.2012 was challenged in O.A.No.324/2013 seeking, additionally, consequential directions to the petitioners to grant ACP in the pay scale of Rs.8000– 13500 with effect from 01.12.2001 taking the hierarchy of the Assistant Librarian/Librarian. Thereafter the impugned order of 20.06.2016 was passed. Hence, the instant petition was filed.
4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in the letter 27.07.2012 sent by the petitioner to the respondent, which has been enclosed at page no.121 of the writ petition, it was observed that the post of Assistant Librarian is a standalone post having no further line of promotion and therefore, the said post has no defined hierarchy; that therefore, the respondent would be given immediately next higher (standard/common) pay scale. The respondent was thus granted the immediate higher pay scale 6500 – 10500 and therefore, grant of pay scale of 8000 – 13500 under the ACP scheme was not admissible. Learned counsel has referred to the O.M. dated 9.08.1999 and its Annexure-1 (paragraph 7), which pertains to conditions of grant of benefits under the ACP Scheme, to contend that the aforesaid letter of 27.07.2012 was in accordance with the conditions mentioned in the O.M. of 09.08.1999. It is stated that by means of an Office Order dated 15.02.2010, the pay of the respondent was fixed as per 5th Central Pay Commission with effect from 01.01.1996 in the higher pay scale of 5500- 175-9000 and the respondent was awarded first ACP in pay scale of 6500-200-10500 with effect from 20.04.2002 with the pay bei


