Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, S.G.PANDIT
Sports Authority Of India, Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium, Rep. By Its Director General, Mr. Injeti Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
Sultana Razia, Since Dead By Lrs.- Qamer Khader Husain, (H/O. Late Sultana Razia, S/o Abdul Wahab) – Respondent
ORDER :
JAYANT BANERJI, J.
Heard Sri.M.C.Thimmaiah, learned counsel holding brief for Sri.Joshua Hudson Samuel learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Ranganath S Jois, learned counsel appearing for the legal representatives of respondent No.1 i.e. Respondent No.1(A to C) as well as Sri.K.Chandra Mohan, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners- Sports Authority of India and others have challenged the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench (for short “Tribunal”) in O.A.No.324/2013. By the impugned order, the O.A. was allowed and the petitioners were directed to place the applicant in the pay-scale of Rs.8000 – 13500 with effect from the date when she completed 24 years of service with consequential benefits. The petitioners were also directed to pass such order, within a period of three months on receiving a copy of the order.
3. From the record of this petition, it appears that the respondent no.1, [respondent] was initially appointed as Library Assistant- cum-Clerk on 05.04.1978 and she was promoted to the post of Assistant Librarian on 31.03.1986. She filed O.A.No.359/2006 seeking a dire
In absence of defined hierarchy, financial upgradation under ACP scheme entitles an employee only to the next higher pay scale, not to a significantly higher one.
ACP financial upgradation follows existing post hierarchy on eligibility date; retrospective recruitment rules cannot deny vested rights without justification, ensuring parity with similarly placed e....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the applicability of pay scales is determined by the specific rules and eligibility criteria for different posts, and the doctrine of equal pa....
Homogeneous cadre of Assistant Librarians entitled to uniform pay scales including UGC benefits despite post-new rules regularization, as appointments predated prospective 2010 rules; parity prevents....
Erroneous ACP financial up-gradation can be withdrawn upon pay scale revision confirming substantive promotion from LDC to Junior Accountant.
The principle of 'equal pay for equal work' is not an abstract doctrine and can be enforced in a Court of law. However, the equation of posts and determination of pay scales is the primary function o....
Retired employees entitled to second ACP in Rs.8000-13500 w.e.f. date of SSS cadre restructuring (12.02.2002) upon completing 24 years service, as non-functional scales ignored and benefits granted i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that pay scale rationalization should be ignored for the purpose of the first financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme, based on the application ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- from the date of her appointment, the benefit of the Sixth Pay Commission,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
