Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V.HOSMANI
NSL Sugars Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of government order under electricity act (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and prior orders (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis on res judicata and jurisdiction (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. extension of interim order (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
RAVI V HOSMANI, J.
WP no.9933/2025 is filed for following reliefs :
A. Declare that the Government Order No.ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and colourable exercise of power and ultra vires to the provisions of ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, as far as Inter- State Open Access generators are concerned. A true copy of Impugned Order Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1
The court ruled that challenges to past decisions cannot be re-litigated in separate writ petitions if they are pending appeals, emphasizing principles of res judicata.
The existence of an alternative appellate remedy precludes maintaining a writ petition unless exceptional circumstances justify bypassing it; KERC did not act beyond its jurisdiction when determining....
The appropriate government under Section 11 of the Electricity Act is the State Government for embedded generators facing state-specific extraordinary circumstances, reaffirming that jurisdiction doe....
The CERC has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes involving generating companies or transmission licensees in regard to matters connected with clauses (a) to (d) of Section 79(1). Clause (b) obvi....
Writ petitions under Article 226 against electricity regulatory commission orders fixing O&M charges not maintainable due to efficacious statutory appeal remedy under Section 111 of Electricity Act, ....
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Writ under Article 226 not maintainable against regulatory order where statutory appeal available, issues involve disputed facts/law, and no jurisdictional error or natural justice violation; exhaust....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
