IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V HOSMANI, J.
NSL Sugars Limited - Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 7803 of 2025 (GM-KEB) C/w Writ Petition No. 9933 of 2025 (GM-KEB)
Decided On : 01-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of government order under electricity act (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and prior orders (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis on res judicata and jurisdiction (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. extension of interim order (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
RAVI V HOSMANI, J.
WP no.9933/2025 is filed for following reliefs :
A. Declare that the Government Order No.ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and colourable exercise of power and ultra vires to the provisions of ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, as far as Inter- State Open Access generators are concerned. A true copy of Impugned Order Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is produced at ANNEXURE - A to A1 (Collectively);
B. Issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate, writ, order direction, declaring Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023, whereby net rate of INR 4.75 per unit payable to the generators who have supplied power under Section 11(1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, is arbitrary, discriminatory, without jurisdiction and illegal, and consequently quash the same. A true copy of Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023, whereby net rate of INR 4.75 per unit payable to the generators who have supplied power under Section 11(1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is produced at ANNEXURE – B.
C. Consequentially, issue a Writ of Certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction quashing demand notices issued by the Respondent ESCOMS, (more fully described in the SCHEDULE 1, hereunder), demanding the Petitioners to pay the alleged differential amount, in compliance of the impugned Order dated 26th November 2024. True copies of the demand notices issued by the Respondent ESCOMS, (more fully described in the SCHEDULE-I hereunder), demanding the Petitioners to pay the alleged differential amount issued in compliance of the impugned Order dated 26th November 2024 are produced herewith as ANNEXURE C to C5 (Collectively);
D. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent ESCOMs not to issue any further demand notice in terms of the Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023. vide Annexure-B.
E. Direct the 8th Respondent Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) to determine the damages for illegally appropriating power meant for Inter- State Open Access during the period from 16th October 2023 to 31st May 2024 with carrying cost at 1% per month etc.
2. While, WP no.7803/2025 filed for these reliefs:
A. Declare that the Government Order No.ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and colourable exercise of power and ultra vires to the provisions of ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, as far as Inter-State Open Access generators are concerned. A true copy of Impugned Order Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1
The court ruled that challenges to past decisions cannot be re-litigated in separate writ petitions if they are pending appeals, emphasizing principles of res judicata.
The existence of an alternative appellate remedy precludes maintaining a writ petition unless exceptional circumstances justify bypassing it; KERC did not act beyond its jurisdiction when determining....
The appropriate government under Section 11 of the Electricity Act is the State Government for embedded generators facing state-specific extraordinary circumstances, reaffirming that jurisdiction doe....
The CERC has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes involving generating companies or transmission licensees in regard to matters connected with clauses (a) to (d) of Section 79(1). Clause (b) obvi....
Writ petitions under Article 226 against electricity regulatory commission orders fixing O&M charges not maintainable due to efficacious statutory appeal remedy under Section 111 of Electricity Act, ....
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Writ under Article 226 not maintainable against regulatory order where statutory appeal available, issues involve disputed facts/law, and no jurisdictional error or natural justice violation; exhaust....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.