SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1374

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAVI V HOSMANI, J.
NSL Sugars Limited - Appellant 
Versus 
State Of Karnataka - Respondent  
Writ Petition No. 7803 of 2025 (GM-KEB) C/w Writ Petition No. 9933 of 2025 (GM-KEB)
Decided On : 01-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SMT.VAHEEDA, SRI S. SRIRANGA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT.SUMANA NAGANAND, SRI B.N. PRAKASH, SMT.SADANA DESAI, ADVOCATE

The court ruled that challenges to past decisions cannot be re-litigated in separate writ petitions if they are pending appeals, emphasizing principles of res judicata.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 11(1) - Challenges to Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203 dated 16th October 2023 and Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by KERC - Petitioners argue orders are arbitrary and illegal, affecting Inter-State Open Access generators. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 12, 14)

(B) Writ of Certiorari - Maintainability - The court found the petition challenging previously adjudicated orders is not tenable as the issues were subject to ongoing appeals - Principles of res judicata apply. (Paras 3, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash governmental orders and decisions by KERC regarding power rates under Section 11 of the Act, claiming illegality and jurisdiction issues concerning inter-State generators.

Findings of Court:
The court dismissed both writ petitions, stating the challenges were already pending in appeals and thus not maintainable in separate petitions.

Issues: The main issues were the jurisdiction of KERC over inter-State generators and whether the petitions were overlapping with prior adjudications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the previous rulings were binding, and that a separate writ petition was impermissible as the underlying issues were sub judice.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge of government order under electricity act (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and prior orders (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's analysis on res judicata and jurisdiction (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. extension of interim order (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER :

RAVI V HOSMANI, J.

WP no.9933/2025 is filed for following reliefs :

A. Declare that the Government Order No.ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and colourable exercise of power and ultra vires to the provisions of ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, as far as Inter- State Open Access generators are concerned. A true copy of Impugned Order Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is produced at ANNEXURE - A to A1 (Collectively);

B. Issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate, writ, order direction, declaring Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023, whereby net rate of INR 4.75 per unit payable to the generators who have supplied power under Section 11(1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, is arbitrary, discriminatory, without jurisdiction and illegal, and consequently quash the same. A true copy of Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023, whereby net rate of INR 4.75 per unit payable to the generators who have supplied power under Section 11(1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is produced at ANNEXURE – B.

C. Consequentially, issue a Writ of Certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction quashing demand notices issued by the Respondent ESCOMS, (more fully described in the SCHEDULE 1, hereunder), demanding the Petitioners to pay the alleged differential amount, in compliance of the impugned Order dated 26th November 2024. True copies of the demand notices issued by the Respondent ESCOMS, (more fully described in the SCHEDULE-I hereunder), demanding the Petitioners to pay the alleged differential amount issued in compliance of the impugned Order dated 26th November 2024 are produced herewith as ANNEXURE C to C5 (Collectively);

D. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent ESCOMs not to issue any further demand notice in terms of the Order dated 26th November 2024 passed by 2nd Respondent KERC in OP No. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 of 2023. vide Annexure-B.

E. Direct the 8th Respondent Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) to determine the damages for illegally appropriating power meant for Inter- State Open Access during the period from 16th October 2023 to 31st May 2024 with carrying cost at 1% per month etc.

2. While, WP no.7803/2025 filed for these reliefs:

A. Declare that the Government Order No.ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1st Respondent purportedly under Section 11 (1) of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and colourable exercise of power and ultra vires to the provisions of ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, as far as Inter-State Open Access generators are concerned. A true copy of Impugned Order Government Order No. ENERGY 82 PPT 203, BENGALURU, dated 16th October 2023, published in the Gazette dated 20th October 2023, along with Corrigendum dated 20th November 2023 published in the Gazette dated 1st December 2023, issued by the 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top