SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 924

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Renew Power Private Ltd. Bikaji Came Place Delhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shodhan Babu, Advocate, Sajjan Poovayya, Advocate, Kusum Ranganath, Advocate, Amrita Joshi, Advocate, Ramesh Gowda, Advocate, Shahbaaz Husain, Advocate, S. Sriranga, Advocate, Murugesh V.Charati, Advocate, S.G. Prashanth Murthy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. These batch of writ petitions which are filed by the petitioners who are renewable energy generating companies involved in the business of independent power production and establishing and operating power plants, while petitioners in some of the petitions are operating solar power plants, petitioners in the other petitions are operating wind power plants. The subject matter of all the petitions are Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) entered into between the petitioners and the various Electricity Supply Companies (ESCOMs), who are arrayed as respondent No.2 in these petitions.

2. The details of the petitioners, PPAs, relevant clauses etc., are as under;-

    PETITIONS (WIND) - PPA CLAUSES DETAILS

Sl. Nos.

WP No.

SPV

Respondent ESCOM

Wind / Solar

PPA Clause for payment of Invoice

PPA Clause for Late Payment Surcharge

PPA Clause for Payment obligation

PPA clause for opening Letter of Credit

PPA Clause for monthly Joint Meter Reading

Dispute Redressal Mechanis m Clause

1

5703 of 2020 (Lead Petition)

Rajat Renewa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top