JUDGMENT :

H.P. SANDESH, J.

1. This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The factual matrix of case of the plaintiff in O.S.No.310/2012 that the suit Sy.No.5/4 totally measuring 2 acre 10 guntas. It was originally belongs to one Chennaiah Lakshmana and Chennarayappa. One Nagamma and her minor son Rangappa purchased 1 acre 5 guntas out of 2 acre 10 gunta under registered sale deed dated 19.12.1962. Thereafter, one Chowdaiah purchased 1 acre 5 guntas under registered sale deed dated 28.02.1982 from Nagamma and Rangappa. Then the said Chowdaiah converted the land measuring 1 acre 5 guntas in Sy.No.5/4. In the year 1979 and 1983 Chowdaiah sold sites to the third parties and they are residing therein. It is also contended that after conversion, the eastern portion of 1 acre assigned as Sy.No.5/4A3 middle portion assigned as Sy.No.5/2A3 and its most western side measuring 5 guntas assigned and re-numbered as Sy.No.5/4A1 by the concerned survey authorities under Haddu basth phodi durasthi work. As such in the year 1993 this Sy.No.5/4A1 and Sy.No.5/4A3 lands are amalgamated to total extent of 1 acre 5 gunta