IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Trammo DMCC (Formerly known as Transammonia DMCC) – Appellant
Versus
Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.
Context and Factual Background:
1. Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 441 of 2017 is a petition filed under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”), seeking recognition and enforcement of five foreign arbitral awards (“Foreign Awards”) in which the Petitioner, Trammo DMCC (“Trammo”), is the judgement creditor while the judgement debtor is the Respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. (“Nagarjuna”), a company whose shares are listed on Indian Stock Exchange.
2. The Foreign Awards are :- i) First Interim Final Award dated December 4, 2015 (“First Award”), as amended on July 4, 2016; ii) First Cost Award dated February 5, 2016 (“First Cost Award”), as amended on July 4, 2016. iii) Costs of Costs Award dated March 10, 2016 (“Second Cost Award”), as amended on July 4, 2016; iv) Second Interim Final Award dated September 20, 2016 (“Second Award”); and v) Third Interim Final Award dated December 14, 2016 (“Third Award”).
3. The Learned Arbitral Tribunal that passed the Foreign Awards was an ad-hoc Arbitral Tribunal seated in London. The Learned Arbitral Tribunal was constituted by the parties with Trammo’s nominee, Sir
Gemini Bay Transcription (P) Ltd. v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd .
Rickmers Verwaltung GMBH v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.
Shri Lal Mahal Limited Vs. Progetto Grano SPA –
Vijay Karia and others Vs. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL and others –
Enforcement of foreign awards under Section 48 bars merits re-review; tribunal findings on deemed acceptance, contract validity via past dealings upheld unless perverse; ad-hoc agreement overrides ru....
Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award is granted under Section 48 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing limited grounds for refusal based on public policy, requiring strong evidence of violation.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is upheld unless specific procedural or public policy violations are proven, which was not established in ....
The enforcement of a foreign arbitral award cannot be resisted on merits, and the validity of an assignment under Sudanese law was upheld, confirming the binding nature of arbitration agreements.
Point of law : Section 34 of English Arbitration Act deals with procedural and evidential matters.
Once declaratory arbitration award came to be passed by arbitral tribunal, same ought to have been challenged by petitioners by exercising its remedy available under provisions of English Arbitration....
(1) Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award – Nothing stands in way of party autonomy in designating a seat of arbitration outside India even when both parties happen to be Indian nationals. (2) Freedo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.