Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, UMESH M. ADIGA
Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd, rep. By Its Director, Mr. Mohan Kumar S.J. – Appellant
Versus
Gokulam Shelters Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the parties and petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observations and implications of jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. background of agreements between parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments against impleading mantri developers. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final decision on the arbitration agreement legitimacy. (Para 41 , 42 , 44) |
ORDER :
JAYANT BANERJI, J.
1. The array of parties in this petition is as under:
| RANK OF THE PARTIES | ||
| ARBITRATION | HIGH COURT | |
| MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, [Mantri Developers] A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, C-5, RICH HOMES, NO.5/1, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560025, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR.MOHAN | RESPONDENT NO.2 | PETITIONER |
| 1. GOKULAM SHELTERS, [Gokulam Shelters] PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY EXISTING UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 | CLAIMANT NO.1 | RESPONDENT NO.1 |
| 2. KRISHNA LILA PARK FOUNDATION, [Krishna Lila], A REGISTERED TRUST | CLAIMANT NO.2 | RESPONDENT NO.2 |
| 3. ISKCON CHARITIES, [ISKCON Charities] A REGISTERED TRUST | CLAIMANT NO.3 | RESPONDENT NO.3 |
| 4. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, [IHF] A REGISTERED TRUST GSPL TO 4 HAVING OFFICE AT 8TH MILE, DODDAKALLASANDRA POST, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 0 | ||
Non-signatories can be bound by arbitration agreements through mutual consent and factors like performance, commonality of subject matter, and the relationship with signatories.
Dissenting non-signatory member of cooperative society not bound by arbitration clause in development agreement with developer; lacks consent as veritable party despite beneficiary status or executin....
A non-signatory cannot be impleaded in arbitration proceedings absent explicit consent, highlighting the importance of party autonomy and contractual privity in arbitration agreements.
The main legal point established is that disputes involving third party rights and allegations of fraud may be deemed non-arbitrable, requiring adjudication in a properly instituted proceeding with t....
Non-signatory cannot be impleaded in arbitration absent conduct showing consent via participation in contract's negotiation, performance or termination; substantial financial interest alone insuffici....
Impleadment of non-signatories in arbitration proceedings is impermissible unless a direct contractual relationship exists, underscoring the importance of party autonomy.
A non-signatory party could be subjected to arbitration provided these transactions were with group of companies and there was a clear intention of the parties to bind both, the signatory as well as ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
