JUDGMENT :

D K SINGH, J.

The present writ appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 03.02.2023 passed in WP.No.39006/2015 was disposed and filed R.P.No.547/2003.

2. The appellant was the petitioner before the learned Single Judge, challenging the award dated 02.05.2015 passed by the Labour Court, Mysuru, in Reference No. 20 of 2013. Before the learned Single Judge, the petitioner-University took the stand that, out of 56 workmen, only 24 had actually worked for the University, while the others had not.

3. Considering this submission, the learned Single Judge found that the said 24 workmen were eligible for appointment and, as such, directed the petitioner- University to appoint them within two months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

4. Regarding the remaining 34 workmen, as mentioned in paragraph 4 of the impugned order, it was observed that if they claimed to have worked for the University, it would be open to them to separately challenge the matter or seek appointment.

5. The impu