IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
DINESH MEHTA, J.
Jayoti Vidyapeeth Womens University, Jaipur, Vedaant Gyan Valley, Village Jharna, Mahala Jobner Link Road, NH-8 Jaipur - Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Ayurveda, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homeopathy (Ayush) - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6865/2021, 6880/2021, 6901/2021, 7099/2021, 6211/2021
Decided on : 31-05-2021
Article 19 - Articles 14 - Constitution of India - Rule 12 - Rule 21 - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Section 36 - AYUSH Courses - Bachelor of Unani Medicines & Surgery - Bachelor of Naturopathy & Yogic Sciences - Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine & Surgery - Courses of Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine & Surgery - Seeking admission against -seats remaining vacant in these Institutions - Petitions have been filed by -institutions - Whether -Council was consulted in relation to -request/representation of -petitioner institution for reduction of percentile marks and what is -Council’s point of view on this issue – Held , If -criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about -standard of -students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake -professional courses - They will really be half-baked professional, as stated by learned counsel for -Council. It may ultimately be fatal to -health of -citizens - In light of -foregoing discussion, this Court is of -firm view that sufficient number of students have qualified NEET - Simply because some seats have remained unfilled, -Central Government cannot be directed to relax -minimum percentile points in NEET, particularly when -same has already been done for each category for this academic year itself - Writ petitions stand disposed of
JUDGMENT :
(1) Out of the captioned writ petitions, cases mentioned at S.Nos.1 to 4 have been filed by the institutions, whereas case mentioned at S.No.5 has been filed by the students, seeking admission against the seats remaining vacant in these Institutions.
(2) The petitioners Nos.1 to 4 are conducting courses of Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine & Surgery (BAMS), Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine & Surgery (BHMS),Bachelor of Naturopathy & Yogic Sciences (BNYS) and Bachelor of Unani Medicines & Surgery (BUMS) commonly known as AYUSH Courses. Petitioners- Institutions are having due approval from the respective statutory bodies.
(3) After the academic session 2019-20, the students in AYUSH Courses are being given admission through counseling, subject to condition of clearing National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NEET’), through counseling, of course on the basis of their merit in such examination.
(4) All petitions involve common facts and question of law, hence, they are being decided conjointly. However, the facts from S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6865/2021 [Jyoti Vidyapeeth Womens University Vs. The U.O.I. & Ors.] are being taken into consideration.
(5) The Central Council of Indian Medicine (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Council’ or ‘the CCIM’), in exercise of powers conferred upon it by the various clauses of sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, framed Regulations, which were published in the Official Gazette of India on 07.12.2018. These Regulations have been named as Indian Medicine Central Council (Minimum Standards of Education in Indian Medicine)(Amendment Regulations), 2018 which hereinafter will be referred to as ‘the Regulations of 2018’ or ‘the Regulations’.
(6) Regulation No.2 of the Regulations of 2018 prescribes required educational qualification and other eligibility criteria for admission in undergraduate course of Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicines (BAMS) according to which, a candidate is eligible for admission, who has passed intermediate (10+2) or equivalent examination with subjects of Physics, Chemistry, Biology and English individually and has obtained minimum aggregate of 50% marks in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, subject to some relaxation carved out for the candidates belonging to SC, ST, OBC Categories and persons with benchmark disability.
(7) Clause (d) of Regulation No.2 of the Regulations of 2018 provides that in order to be eligible for admission to undergraduate course in an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate of unreserved category to secure minimum of marks at 50th percentile in the NEET held for such academic year. Relaxation in this requirement has also been provided to the candidates belonging to SC, ST, OBC and persons with disabilities and accordingly, in case of candidates of SC, ST and OBC, the minimum passing marks is 40th percentile and for persons with disabilities it is 45th percentile for general category and 40th percentile for SC, ST, OBC.
(8) A proviso is appended with above referred clause (d) of Regulation No.2 of the Regulations, which postulates that in case substantial number of candidates in respective categories fail to secure minimum marks in the NEET held in a particular academic year, the Central Government, in consultation with the CCIM may at its discretion lower the minimum marks required for admission to undergraduate course, however, with a condition that such relaxation would be applicable for that academic year only.
(9) Before proceeding further, it would be apt to sail through the Regulation No.2 of the Regulations of 2018, which reads as under:-
(a) The candidate must have passed (10+2) or its equivalent examination recognised by the concerned State Governme
Union of India v. Federation of Self-Financed Ayurvedic Colleges
Union of India Vs. Federation of Self-Financed Ayurvedic Colleges
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medi....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
Section 55(1) of 2020 Act empowers Commission to make regulations to carry out provisions.
The court emphasized the need for balanced admission policies to fill vacancies in Homoeopathy colleges without compromising educational standards, recommending criteria for effective implementation ....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.