SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
VIBHU BAKHRU, C.J., C.M.JOSHI, J.
 
M/S Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Represented By It's General Manager – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Indira Shankar, W/o. Sri Late E. Shankar – Respondent 
Writ Appeal No. 1201 Of 2024 (S-PRO)
Decided On : 28-11-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Pradeep S. Sawkar, Adv
For the Respondent: Sri. Cyril Prasad Pais, Adv.

A public sector undertaking cannot unilaterally de-recognize educational qualifications, which must be recognized by statutory bodies, impacting promotion criteria and employment rights.

Headnote:(A) University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 2(f) - All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Cancellation of promotion - Respondent promoted to Grade III based on qualifications from an unrecognized Institute - The learned Single Judge found the General Manager lacked authority to de-recognize qualifications, and that the qualifications obtained were presumed valid under Indian law - HAL's subsequent reversion order was upheld. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Promotion Criteria - Validity of promotions based on educational qualifications recognized or unrecognized by statutory bodies - Courts will not interfere with an employer's policy unless it is arbitrary or capricious. (Paras 1-26)

Facts of the case:
The respondent was promoted but later reverted to her previous position based on the contention that her qualification was from an unrecognized Institute. The learned Single Judge ruled in favor of the respondent, prompting an appeal from HAL.

Findings of Court:
The General Manager's de-recognition of the qualifications was invalid, and HAL did not have authority to unilaterally negate recognized qualifications.

Issues: The key issues were whether the respondent's qualifications met HAL's promotion criteria and the validity of the 2012 Circular issued by HAL.

Ratio Decidendi: The respondent's qualifications conferred by the Institute were recognized by the Government but not by AICTE, leading to the conclusion that HAL's reliance on the 2012 Circular for the promotion decision was misplaced.

Result: Appeal allowed and the impugned order set aside.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHU BAKHRU, C.J.

1. The appellant, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited [hereafter 'HAL'] ‒ a public sector undertaking, under the aegis of the Department of Defence Production, Ministry of Defence, Government of India ‒ has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 01.04.2024 [impugned order], passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.30867/2014 (S-PRO) captioned 'Smt. Indira Shankar v. M/s. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited'. The said writ petition was filed by the respondent impugning an order dated 04.06.2014 cancelling the respondent's promotion order dated 01.07.2013, whereby the respondent was promoted to the post of Grade - III. Consequently, the respondent was reverted to the post of HR Officer (Grade-II). The said reversion order was premised on the basis that the respondent did not hold the necessary qualification for grant of promotion from Grade-II to Grade-III.

2. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition. The learned Single Judge held that the reversion order dated 04.06.2014 was based on a circular dated 20.09.2012 [the 2012 Circular], de-recognizing the qualifications acquired from Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad Institute of Communication and Management, Mumbai, issued by the General Manager of HAL. The learned Single Judge found that the General Manager had no authority to de-recognize any qualification and the aforementioned Circular was without any statutory basis. Additionally, the Court held that institutions such as Rajendra Prasad Institute of Communication Studies operated under the ambit of Indian law and the diplomas conferred by such institutions affiliated to recognized entities, such as Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, are presumed to adhere to the prevailing standards of educational quality and integrity, absent any evidence to the contrary. Aggrieved by the said decision, HAL has preferred the present appeal.

Prefatory facts

3. HAL is a public sector undertaking, inter alia, engaged in manufacturing, supply and over-hauling of Fighter and Transport Aircrafts and Helicopters. It also provides a range of ancillary services. The respondent took up employment with HAL in the year 1984. During her employment with HAL, she acquired the qualification of the Bachelor of Arts from Mysore University in the year 1986.

4. The respondent obtained a Post Graduate Diploma in Personnel Management and Industrial Relations from Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad Institute of Communication and Management, Mumbai [hereafter ‘the Institute'] during April 2004. The said qualification was entered in the respondent's personal records on 23.08.2004.

5. Thereafter, in the year 2005, the respondent was promoted to Grade I Officer. Subsequently, the respondent was further promoted to the post of Joint Executive Assistant (Grade II) with effect from 01.07.2009. The said post was subsequently re-categorized/re-classified as ‘HR Officer’.

6. HAL issued a Circular dated 11.08.2006 [the 2006 Circular], which prescribed eligibility criteria for promotions in Non-Technical Disciplines to persons possessing professional qualifications. In terms of the 2006 Circular, a candidate possessing PG Degree/ Diploma in the concerned discipline involving a course of one-year duration, from a recognized University/Institution was eligible for promotion. The relevant extract of the 2006 Circular is set out below:

"iii) Workmen in Scales-8, 9 & 10 possessing the Qualification of University Degree + PG Degree/Diploma in the concerned Discipline (of atleast one year duration acquired from a recognized University/Institution before 23.6.06) (as against the date of 30.11.03 indicated in Corporate Office Circular No.HAL/P&A/DM(N)/27(1)/97/623 dated 18th Nov. 2004), will be eligible for consideration for promotion against the vacancies earmarked for professionally Qualified Workmen, on completion of one year service in Scale-8, in the concerned Non-Technical Discipline. Further, Workmen in Scales-8, 9 & 10 p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top