Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
C.M.JOSHI
Sharadabai W/o. Fakkirappa Jorapur – Appellant
Versus
Anand S/o. Gopal Jorapur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)
This appeal arises out of the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court in O.S.No.185/2006 dated 06.03.2009 and R.A.No.62/2009 dated 18.01.2013 whereby the suit filed for partition came to be decreed.
2. The factual matrix that is necessary for the purpose of this appeal may be summarized as below:
a) The plaintiffs and the defendants are the descendents of one Dyamappa Jorapur. The family pedigree as depicted, which is not in dispute is as below:
3. The case of the plaintiffs as per the pleadings is as follows:
a) The defendant No.1 happens to be the wife of Fakirappa, who was the first son of Dyamappa. Fakirappa had his first wife Sitabai, who is no more. Fakirappa and his first wife Sitabai and second wife-defendant No.1 were issueless. The brother of Fakirappa i.e., Ramappa predeceased him leaving behind his three sons i.e., Subhash, Gopal and Raju. Gopal died on 28.04.2006 leaving behind the plaintiff No.1 to 3. Raju, the third son of Ramappa, died leaving behind him his sons defendant No.3 to 4.
b) It is the case of the plaintiffs that Fakirappa and Ramappa were living together as a joint family and were
The burden of proof to establish property as self-acquired rests on the party asserting so, once a joint family nucleus is established, underscoring the necessity of evidence to support claims.
The presumption of joint family property does not apply if the property is proven to be self-acquired; the burden of proof lies on the claimant of joint family property.
Daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 2005, regardless of prior claims of partition.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
In joint family property disputes, the burden of proof lies with the party claiming self-acquisition, and failure to substantiate claims results in the affirmation of joint property status.
A partition among heirs was established, and the properties in question were determined to be self-acquired, nullifying the plaintiffs' claims of joint family property.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties acquired from individual earnings of family members cannot be treated as joint family properties unless deliberate abandonment and ....
The presumption of joint family status in Hindu law requires clear evidence to establish prior partition; the Appellate Court allowed partition of one property acquired post-partition while dismissin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
