SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.G. Pandit, K.V. Aravind, JJ.
Smt. Nalina G. A. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department – Respondent
W.P.No.17562 of 2025 (S-KSAT), W.P.No.26182 of 2023, W.P.No.12507 of 2024 and W.P.No.19017 of 2024 (S-KSAT)
Decided On : 21-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. P.S. Rajagopal, Sr. Adv. For Sri Raghavendra G Gayatri, Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri.Reuben Jacob, Aag A/W Sri B Ravindranath, Aga

Vested rights of promoted employees cannot be impaired by subsequent administrative actions, preserving seniority acquired under prior rules.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Panchayath Raj Engineering Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2008 - Rule 2, Rule 3; Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1979 - Rule 16(1); Karnataka Government Servants’ (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal regarding seniority disputes between Absorbed AEs and DR-AEs in the RDPR Department - The Tribunal ruled that Absorbed AEs can only claim seniority from their date of absorption, as advised by the 2021 Rules, thus maintaining that their absorption in public interest does not affect the seniority of DR-AEs - In particular, the Tribunal confirmed the valid promotions of DR-AEs prior to the Absorbed AEs' absorption as AEEs - The court held that rights acquired under the 2008 Rules are preserved and thus not subject to annulment by the state - (Paras 29, 30, 31)

(B) Seniority - Principles governing absorption and promotion in public service - The rights acquired by DR-AEs prior to the absorption of Absorbed AEs are protected under law; hence, the Absorbed AEs cannot claim seniority over DR-AEs who were promoted prior to their absorption. (Paras 21, 22, 24)

Facts of the case:
The subject matter involves Absorbed AEs protesting for seniority over DR-AEs despite the latter's prior promotion and independent charge under government rules; the matter was adjudicated across several applications before the Tribunal which were eventually dismissed. (Paras 6, 10, 20)

Findings of Court:
The absorbed AEs cannot retroactively claim seniority over DR-AEs promoted before their absorption. Such claims result in the infringing of rights acquired under established rules. The Notification dated 03.06.2025, treating Absorbed AEs as seniors, lacks legal justifications and was stayed by the court. (Paras 24, 29, 31)

Issues: The main issues concern seniority rights of Absorbed AEs versus DR-AEs and the validity of the Notification that disturbed established seniority lists. (Paras 17, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that vested rights acquired through promotion cannot be impaired without due legislative process; therefore, prior promotions held by DR-AEs remain intact, reinforcing the principle of legal certainty in administrative promotions. (Paras 22, 29)

Result: Writ Petitions Nos. 26182/2023, 12507/2024 and 19017/2024 are dismissed. Writ Petition No. 17562/2025 is allowed, and the associated notification is stayed.

Table of Content
1. dispute involving seniority between absorbed and directly recruited aes (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. background on absorption and promotions in rdpr department (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. contentions regarding seniority and rights of absorbed aes vs. dr-aes (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
4. apex court's stance on vested rights regarding promotions (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. final rulings on seniority and orders of the court (Para 31 , 32)

ORDER :

S.G. PANDIT, J.

In the above batch of Writ Petitions, the grievance of the parties is common and it is the dispute between the Absorbed Assistant Engineers, Hereinafter referred to as ‘Absorbed AEs’ and Direct Recruit Assistant Engineers, Hereinafter referred to as ‘DR-AEs’ in the Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Hereinafter referred to as ‘RDPR Department’. Hence, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, all the above Writ Petitions are taken up together, heard and disposed of by this common order.

2. In Writ Petition No.26182/2023, Absorbed AEs are before this court questioning the order dated 08.08.2023 in Application Nos. 3505-3509 of 2022 C/w Application Nos. 2426-2430 of 2022, wherein, their prayer to quash the rankings assigned to private respondents(DR-AEs) in the impugned seniority list dated 02.07.2022(Annexure-A4) of the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers, Hereinafter referred to as ‘AEEs’ and in the seniority list dated 20.09.2021(Annexure-A10) of the cadre of Assistant Engineer, Hereinafter referred to as ‘AEs’ and to include their name over and above the private respondents with all consequential benefits was refused by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, For short ‘Tribunal’

3. In Writ Petition No.12507/2024, the Absorbed AEs are before this court aggrieved by the Order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Tribunal in Application Nos. 4568- 4582/2023 rejecting their prayer to set aside the notification dated 20.09.2021(Annexure A23), i.e. seniority list in the cadre of AEs and also to set aside notification dated 02.07.2022 (Annexure-A28), i.e. seniority list in the cadre of AEEs with a direction to publish the revised seniority list and to assign appropriate rankings with all consequential benefits.

4. In Writ Petition No.19017/2024, the Absorbed AEs are before this Court aggrieved by order dated 04.07.2024 passed by the Tribunal in Application Nos. 2089 to 2094/2024 rejecting their prayer to set aside the notification dated 20.9.2021(Annexure A15), i.e. seniority list in the cadre of AEs and also to set aside notification dated 02.07.2022,i.e. seniority list in the cadre of AEEs with a direction to publish the revised seniority list and to assign appropriate rankings with all consequential benefits.

5. In Writ Petition No. 17562/2025, the DR-AEs are before this Court aggrieved by an Interim Order dated 09.06.2025 in Application Nos. 2459 to 2465/ 2025 wherein their prayer to stay impugned communication dated 03.06.2025(Annexure A13) directing to treat Absorbed AEs as absorption in public interest and to treat the 2016 DR-AEs as juniors under notification dated 03.06.2025 and consequently, cancelling the seniority list of AEs and AEEs published on 20.09.2021 and 02.07.2022, respectively, is refused.

6. The brief facts of the case are that the Absorbed AEs were initially appointed as AEs in the year 2004 to the combined department of Public Works, Irrigation and Rural Development. Whereas, the DR-AEs were directly recruited and appointed as AEs in RDPR Department under Karnataka Panchayath Raj Engineering Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2008 (For Short ‘2008 Rules’) on 08.01.2016.

7. On 20.9.2019, the DR-AEs were placed in independent charge under Rule 32 of KCSRs as AEEs in the RDPR Department. The absorbed AEs challenged the said order dated 20.09.2019 placing DR-AEs in independent charge as AEEs in the RDPR Department before the Tribunal in Application Nos. 7493-7502 of 2019. The Tribunal by order dated 04

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top