Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
D.K. SINGH, VENKATESH NAIK T
BSE Limited – Appellant
Versus
Khoday India Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VENKATESH NAIK T, J.
OSA No.3/2020 is filed by the appellant/BSE Limited (Bombay Stock Exchange Limited) under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 r/w Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies Court Rules, 1969 read with Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act to set-aside the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the learned Company Judge in C.A.No.289/2016 in CoP.No.132/2014, whereas, OSA No.28/2015 is filed by the Security Exchange Board of India('SEBI' for short) to set- aside the order dated 21.09.2015 passed in C.A.No.1415/2014, C.A.No.313/2015, C.A.No.1648/2014, C.A.No.1778/2014 and C.A.No.1416/2014 in CoP No.132/2014.
2. The brief facts of the appellant's case in OSA No.3/2020 are as under:-
The appellant/BSE is a recognized stock exchange as defined under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (for short 'SERA'). The respondent/Khoday India Limited is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of Indian Manufactured Liquor. The respondent's authorized share capital is Rs.45,00,00,000/- divided into 4,50,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-each. The paid-up capital of the Company is Rs.37,59,12,370/- divided i
Companies must comply with regulatory requirements for Minimum Public Shareholding before executing capital reductions to protect investor interests.
The statutory provisions governing the field provide for a transparent mechanism of delisting the securities, adequate participation and/ or representation of public shareholders in the process of de....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of minority shareholders to documents related to SEBI investigations and show cause notices, and the obligation of SEBI to comply w....
The court held that regulators can impose conditions on settlement applications under the SEBI Act, prioritizing public interest over private vested rights, and dismissed the petition challenging the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validation of SEBI's Exit Policy and SECC Regulations, finding them in consonance with the SCR Act, and the court's direction for CSE to comply....
(1) Rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of Companies Act, 2013 is summary in nature and not intended to be exercised where there are contested facts and disputed questions.(2) Public administ....
The court emphasized a pragmatic approach in granting extensions for compliance with regulatory requirements, prioritizing shareholder interests and the absence of grievances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
