SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
M/S Axis Bank Limited, Represented By Its Authorized Representative Mr. Vijay Hottin, S/o. Lingappa – Petitioner
Versus
Santosh Siddappa Myageri, S/o. Siddappa – Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 108645 of 2025 (GM-DRT)
Decided On : 24-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Sachin C. Angadi, Advocate

Under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, a court is not required to provide notice to a debtor or consider claims from third parties regarding secured assets during the possession proceedings.

Headnote:(A) SARFAESI Act, 2002 - Section 14 - Judicial proceedings for possession - Court observed that a possession delivery warrant is not binding on third parties in possession; the court cannot go beyond the requests made within the confines of Section 14, which does not require notice to the debtor. (Paras 3, 11.2, 11.8)

(B) Right of parties - Only the aggrieved party can seek redress post-action through Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act as remedies under Section 14 do not afford consideration of external claims. (Paras 12.1, 12.6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner bank sought to challenge the order stating that the possession delivery warrant does not bind third parties, relating to possession of secured assets under a SARFAESI Act claim. The order allowed the bank to take possession via a Court Commissioner within a timeline, subject to certain deposit requirements.

Findings of Court:
The concerned Court overstepped its jurisdiction by stating that the possession delivery warrant is non-binding on third parties, as it misinterpreted the procedural requirements of the SARFAESI Act.

Issues: Whether the Court can issue orders beyond the request made under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act and the necessity of notice to the debtor.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of the jurisdictional boundaries set by Section 14, indicating no obligation for notice to be given to a debtor and affirming the rights of interested parties through Section 17 post-ownership claims.

Result: Petition disposed of as per the findings.

ORDER :

M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

a. Issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari setting aside the observation that “This possession delivery warrant is not binding on the 3rd parties, if they are in possession of the property in any of the capacity, passed in the order dated 20.03.2025 in Crl.Mis.No.96/2024 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Koppal vide Annexure-A

b. Pass such other order as deems fit to the Hon’ble Court including cost.

2. The issue that brings the petitioner bank to this Court is an outlandish order passed by the concerned Court. The order passed by the concerned Court reads as follows:

“ This petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is hereby allowed.

The petitioner is entitled to take physical possession of the secured asset which is described in the petition as achedule property.

Sri. Tajuddin s/o Mahmmad Hussain Sab Advocate [KAR/413/2022, Cell No.8722493947 R/o C/o Khajavalisab Lathi, Kumbar street, Bahaddurbandi village, Tq and Dist: Koppal is appointed as Court Commissioner with direction to take physical possession of the secured asset by drawing mahazar and also by taking video, audio/photographs at the cost of petitioner and hand over in favour of the petitioners within 60 days from the date of this order and submit compliance report before the office.

His fee is fixed for an amount of Rs.5,000/-.

Petitioners are directed to deposit the commission fee before the office or pay directly to the court commissioner by taking receipt from him within 15 days from the date of this order along with PF.

Further directed to furnish necessary particulars of this order and property in favour of the court commissioner within 15 days from the date of this order.

Further directed to assist the court commissioner for conducting the commissioner work actively and take actual possession of the secured asset on the date fixed by the court commissioner.

Office is directed to issue commissioner warrant in the name of court commissioner, if commission fee is deposited or payment receipt is furnished about payment of commission fee infavour of the court commissioner along with necessary particulars of this order and secured asset.

The possession delivery warrant is not binding on the 3rd parties, if they are in possession of the property in any of the capacity.

3. In a proceeding under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, it is trite that the concerned Court cannot go beyond what is sought. In the case at hand, it is apparent that the concerned Court has overstepped its jurisdiction. The issue in the lis stands answered by what is considered by the Co-ordinate Bench in Writ Petition No.105775/2025 disposed on 08.09.2025 which reads as follows:

11. Answer to point No.3: Whether a magistrate is required to issue any notice to the debtor while exercising power under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act?

11.1 Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:

14. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to assist secured creditor in taking possession of secured asset.—(1) Where the possession of any secured assets is required to be taken by the secured creditor or if any of the secured assets is required to be sold or transferred by the secured creditor under the provisions of this Act, the secured creditor may, for the purpose of taking possession or control of any such secured assets, request, in writing, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District Magistrate within whose jurisdiction any such secured asset or other documents relating thereto may be situated or found, to take possession thereof, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or, as the case may be, the District Magistrate shall, on such request being made to him—

(a) take possession of such asset and documents relating thereto; and

(b) forward such asset and documents to the secured creditor:

[Provided that any application by the secured creditor shall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top