SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2819

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. Krishna Kumar, J.
Sri. Arun Kumar Mahapatra – Petitioner
Versus
Karnataka State Open University – Respondent
Writ Petition No.21558 of 2025 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 03-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Sham Sundar P., Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. H.R. Showri, Advocate, Sri. T.P. Rajendra Kumar Sungay, Advocate

Students admitted until 2012-13 are entitled to Degree Certificates irrespective of completion date, as affirmed by past judicial rulings.

Headnote:(A) Writ of Mandamus - Educational Institutions - The court directed Karnataka State Open University to issue Degree Certificates and Marks cards to petitioners who completed their courses by the academic year 2012-13, emphasizing on the necessity to act upon previous court directives and recognizing the rights of students. (Paras 4, 6, 8)

(B) Judicial Precedents - The court relied on a precedent where similar relief was granted, reinforcing that students admitted till the year 2012-13 are entitled to receive their certificates regardless of the completion date. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners completed their M.A (Sanskrit) from Karnataka State Open University in 2014-15 but were not issued Degree Certificates despite multiple requests. Similar cases in prior petitions received favorable outcomes. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the right of the petitioners to receive their educational certificates and directed the university to provide the necessary documentation within four weeks. (Paras 7, 8)

Issues: Whether the university is obligated to issue certificates and conduct supplementary exams for the students admitted until 2012-13; validities of previous rulings were considered. (Para 7)

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that students admitted up to 2012-13 are entitled to their certificates as per prior judgments and directed the university to comply with the rulings. (Paras 6, 8)

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners demand issuance of degree certificates. (Para 1 , 4)
2. court's reasoning aligns with past case outcomes. (Para 2 , 8)
3. admissions confirmed for ksou up to 2012-13. (Para 3 , 7)
4. court cites previous judgments supporting petitioners. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:

i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to issue Degree Certificates to the petitioners forthwith, and;

ii) Direct the respondent No.1 University to verify the educational qualification of the Petitioners, as and when sought by the employers, and ;

iii) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant, in the facts and circumstances of the case including the costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioners were admitted to respondent No.1- Karnataka State Open University for Post Graduate Degree in M.A (Sanskrit) through academic collaborative institution and completed their final year M.A in the year 2014-15, pursuant to which the respondent No.1-KSOU issued provisional pass certificates in favour of the petitioners.

4. It is the grievance of the petitioners that though repeated requests were made by them to issue Marks card, Degree Certificate in favour of the petitioners, the respondent No.1-KSOU did not take any steps in this regard and as such the petitioners are before this Court seeking the aforesaid reliefs by placing reliance upon a judgment of this Court in the case of Suhas.M and Others Vs. Karnataka State Open University and Another in W.P.No.24293/2021 dated 17.08.2022

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6. A perusal of the material on record including the aforesaid judgment in Suhas's case supra will indicate that under identical circumstances, in relation to students who have joined the respondent No.1-KSOU up to the academic year 2012-2013, this Court held as under:

In this petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of the mandamus, directing the respondent to issue marks cards and Degree Certificates to the petitioners forthwith, and ;

(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to conduct the examinations of various PG/UG courses to the students admitted up till 2012- 13 through collaborative institutions to enable them to complete their course, and;

(iii) Direct the respondent No.1 University to verify the educational qualifications of students admitted through collaborative institutions up till the academic year 2012- 13, as and when sought by the employers, and ;

(iv) Grant such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant, in the facts and circumstances of the case including the costs, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the Memorandum of Petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that despite the undisputed facts and circumstances including the directions issued by this Court in the earlier rounds of litigation in W.P.No.34255/2016, W.P.Nos.39131-160/2019 and W.P.11062/2020, the respondent No.1 – KSOU is not taking any steps to comply with the directions issued by this Court and as such, the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 - KSOU invites my attention to the statement of objections and documents produced by it and submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

5. The materi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top