SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2889

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.I.ARUN
CHANNAKESHAVA B TINGARIKAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background facts of the murder case and bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. bail granted under conditions; implications of influence. (Para 3 , 4)
3. influence allegations and prosecution's response. (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
4. standards for cancelling bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. conclusion and order to reinstate bail. (Para 14)

ORDER :

M.I.ARUN, J.

One Yogesh Gouda was murdered on 15.06.2016. The petitioner was one of the Investigation Officer who investigated the murder. After investigation, charge sheet was filed accusing six persons of being involved in the murder of the said Yogesh Gouda. Allegations were also made against a sitting Member of Legislative Assembly ('MLA' for short), certain Police Officers including the petitioner herein and few other persons of trying to cover up the murder and it was alleged that the main conspirator of the murder was one of the sitting MLA of the State of Karnataka, and ultimately, the case was transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI' for short) for fresh investigation. The CBI, after due investigation, has made twenty one persons as accused involved in the murder of Yogesh Gouda and also for trying to protect the real accused. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top