SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 720

H.L.GOKHALE, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Yeshwant Redkar & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - GOKHALE H.L., J.:—This appeal and the cross objection arise out of an oral judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 4th September, 1996 allowing the writ petition filed by respondent No. 1 herein against his dismissal from service but substituting the impugned departmental order passed by the Appellant with only compensation. The appellant is aggrieved by that part of the order passed by the learned Single Judge which interferes with their disciplinary order and that is why it has filed this appeal. The respondent No. 1, on the other hand, is aggrieved by that part of the order passed by the learned Single Judge not granting the full relief of reinstatement with full back wages which the respondent No. 1 had sought in the said writ petition. That is why the respondent No. 1 has filed the cross objection.

2.The short facts leading to this appeal are as follows :

The respondent No. 1 was working as an Acting Deputy Manager in-charge of Oil Movement and Storage Department under the Appellant at is refinery situated in Chembur, Mumbai. The Appellant is a statutory Corporation set up under the ESSO Acquisition Act, 1974 and also incorporated under the Co













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top