IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
(NAGPUR BENCH)
J.N. PATEL & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
Vinayak s/o. Shankarrao Bapat & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Chandrapur & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No.206 of 2004
Decided on 7th June, 2006.
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 143 Bombay Police Act, Section 167 Removal of unauthorised parking & obstruction. Where S.D.M. had passed an interim order under Section 143, Cr PC against police and Municipal Authorities directing them to prevent unauthorised parking and obstruction but no action taken by authorities therefore authorities directed to see that order passed by magistrate are maintained without any violation.
2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners who are citizens of India and permanent residents of Chandrapur are seeking a writ of mandamus directing Respondents No.1 to 4 or their agents, servants, representatives etc. to forthwith implement the order dated 17.1.2002 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chandrapur, in Misc. Criminal Case No.2/133/2001 and to remove all unauthorised parking as well as all the illegal obstructions such as approach ways, sign boards/ hoardings and other construction and maintain order on the approach road bearing No.1932 situated in Santi Ward, Civil Lines, Chandrapur. The Second prayer is to adequately monitor and ensure free movement of traffic on said approach road and to depute police personnel for that purposes. It is also prayed that Respondents should be directed to allocate separate and earmarked area at a convenient place for the parking of private buses. The prayers have been amended on the last date and direction has also been sought for taking all effective steps in removing unauthorised parking as well as illegal constructions like sign boards, hoardings, encroachments, illegal constructions on public premises, public roads, public lanes causing obstructions in the free movement of traffic in Chandrapur and to consider framing of general guidelines in public interest to be strictly followed by Government, Municipalities, Police and other Civil authorities in this respect.
3. The petitioner No.1 is an advocate and petitioner No.2 is a senior citizen, who happens to be his father. Both are residing at Plot No.1923 at Sarai Ward, Civil Lines, Chandrapur. Part of the premises is leased out by them to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) where BSNL is having its office establishment. Another part of first petitioner's premises is let out to one Dr. Dhanshree Shende, who is running her clinic. The third petitioner is also a Doctor and a Cardiologist by profession. He is owner of Plot No.1931 formerly bearing No.29/l and 29/2 in the same area and he is running his clinic there. The Municipal Council, Chandrapur, i.e. Respondent No.3 is local authority constituted under the provisions of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as Municipal Act). It is also a planning authority functioning under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as Town Planning Act). It has constructed a permanent tar road admeasuring 12 ft. and it bears No.1932. This road is commonly called as "Bapat Galli" or lane. On the southern side of this Bapat Galli is situated a commercial complex by name "Haweli Complex" while on the northern side is situated a commercial complex named as "Thakur Complex". This approach road passes between two complexes and connects the main road of PWD. The grievance of the petitioners is that since approach road is surrounded by commercial complexes on both the sides and because of large-scale commercial activity in the area, there is considerable vehicular traffic and flow of people and the approach road is always crowded during all times of the day. The ambulances attached to the nearby hospitals/clinics as well as the trucks and jeeps owned by BSNL ply regularly on this approach road. Similarly, two wheelers, scooters, motor bikes, auto-rickshaws and bicycles are haphazardly parked on the main road making it impossible to drive through the road without damaging the vehicle. There is unauthorised parking on both sides of this approach road. Even the shopkeepers of the adjoining commercial complexes have constructed unauthorised approach ways and have erected sign boards and hoardings on the approach road. At the junction, where this approach road/ Bapat Galli merg
Almitra Patel Vs. Union of India
Padma Vs. Hiralal Motilal Desarda
Friends Colony Development Committee Vs. State of Orissa
Municipal Committee, Karnal Vs. Nirmala Devi
Cantorment Board, Jabalpur Vs. S.N. Awasthi
Mahendra Baburao Mahadik Vs. Subhash Krishna Kanitkar
M.J. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu
Debashis Roy Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation
Virendra Gaur Vs. State of Haryana
Almitra H. Patel Vs. Union of India
Sodan Singh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Saudan Singh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
N. Jagdishan Vs. District Collector, North Arcot
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Nawab Khan
Sodan Singh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Sodan Singh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation Vs. Navi Mumbai Hawkers & Workers Union
Sodan Singh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee. 2003(10) SCC 216
Syed Muzaffar Ali Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Shiv Kumar Chadha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Chandigarh Administration Vs. Namit Kumar
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group
Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union Vs. Municipal Corporation Greater Bombay
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.