S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. After condoning the delay, by consent, this review petition is taken up for admission.

2. It is most unfortunate and we must bring this to the notice of all concerned that routinely, review petitions are filed in this Court, after the orders under review are unsuccessfully challenged before the higher Court but liberty is sought to present a review petition. The higher Court, with greatest respect, is informed that certain points or arguments, allegedly crucial to the case and going to the root of the matter were either not canvassed or canvassed but not considered. Such an argument is raised before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India at the instance of the aggrieved parties by a counsel instructed by an advocate who had no opportunity to argue the matter before this Court. After the Hon'ble Supreme Court is persuaded to grant liberty to file a review petition, invariably such review petitions are filed and argued by the parties through different set of advocates and who were not on record or engaged to argue when the orders under review are passed. This set of advocates present the review petition and seek to re-argue the matter by relying on the l