S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, G.S.PATEL
Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Through Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.
By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the essential challenge of the petitioners is to the induction of Mr. Radhakrushna Vikhe Patil, Mr. Jaydatta Kshirsagar and Mr. Avinash Mahatekar as Cabinet Ministers and Minister of State, respectively in the Maharashtra State Cabinet of Ministers. As the challenge is common, both petitions can be disposed of by a single Judgment.
2. We take the facts in Writ Petition No. 6996 of 2019 fled by Mr. Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar. He says that he is a member of the Indian National Congress Legislature Party. He has been elected to the Maharashtra State Legislative Council for a term of six years. He is a leader of the Lower House of the Maharashtra State Legislature. He had officiated as Minister of State twice in the past.
3. The Respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7 are inducted in the State Cabinet by the Respondent No. 2 and were sworn in as Ministers by the Hon'ble Governor of Maharashtra in terms of the advice tendered to him. These three persons are not members of the legislature.
4. As far as Respondent No. 5 is concerned, he was elected as a Member of the Legislative Assembly from Shirdi consti
A. Abdul Farook v. Municipal Council
Bhanumati v. State of U.P. [(2010) 12 SCC 1]
B.P. Singhal v. Union of India
Goodyear India Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Gujarat Assembly Election Matter In Re
I.R. Coelho v. State of T.N. [(2007) 2 SCC 1]
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 : AIR 1973 SC 1461
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Mangal Singh v. Union of India [AIR 1967 SC 944 : (1967) 2 SCR 109
M.J. Sivani v. State of Karnataka [(1995) 6 SCC 289]
Manoj Narula v. Union of India
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal v. State of Maharashtra
Patangrao Kadam v. Prithviraj Sayajirao Yadav Deshmukh [(2001) 3 SCC 594]
R. Rajagopal v. State of T.N. [(1994) 6 SCC 632
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras [AIR 1950 SC 124 : (1950) 51 Cri LJ 1514]
Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab [AIR 1955 SC 549
R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India
S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab
Shailesh Manubhai Parmar v. Election Commission of India
State of Maharashtra v. Jalgaon Municipal Council [(2003) 9 SCC 731
State (NCT at Delhi) v. Union of India
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India
S.C. Advocates-on-Record Assocn. v. Union of India ((1993) 4 SCC 441)
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India [(1993) 4 SCC 441 : AIR 1994 SC 268]
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab
Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P.
State (NCT at Delhi) v. Union of India is concerned
S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal
U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Sant Steels & Alloys (P) Ltd. [(2008) 2 SCC 777 : AIR 2008 SC 693
VR Kapoor v. State of Tamil Nadu
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan [(1997) 6 SCC 241 : 1997 SCC (Cri) 932
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.