R.K.DESHPANDE, VINAY JOSHI
Madhukar Sampatrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.K. Deshpande, J.
1. This petition is filed in public interest to command the respondents to immediately remove the encroachments made on the lands reserved for public utility, garden, dispensary and educational purposes from the Bezanbag area in the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. It further prays to command the respondents to take care that the encroachments do not occur again after their removal. The petition has been filed by five persons, amongst which the petitioner No. 1 claims to be the social worker, however his name is deleted as per the order passed by this Court on 6-5-2014.
2. By an administrative order dated 1-4-2008 passed by the then Senior Administrative Judge at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the petition was directed to be treated as Public Interest Litigation, as it highlights the apathy and inaction on the part of the respondents to remove the encroachments on the public utility land and espouse the cause of the Bezanbag residents. Notice was issued on 3-4-2008 to the respondents.
3. The respondent No. 1 is the Urban Development Department, whereas the respondent No. 2 is the Revenue Department of the State Government, the respondent No. 3 is
Dipak Kumar Mukherjee v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and others
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council
Virender Gaur v. State of Haryana
Pleasant Stay Hotel v. Palani Hills Conservation Council
Pratibha Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shaym Sahu
Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa
Shanti Sports Club v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.