S. V. GANGAPURWALA, S. G. DIGE
Sanjay S/o Kisanrao Kenekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Through it’s Principal Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.G. Dige, J.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the parties taken up for final hearing at admission stage.
2. The petitioner is appointed as a Part Time Chairman of Aurangabad Housing and Development Board, Aurangabad (Hereinafter referred to as “the Board”) by respondent no.1- State Government. On 31st January, 2020, a notification was issued under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (Hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) by respondent no.1 - State Government and by the said notification, the appointment of the petitioner as Part Time Chairman is cancelled. The said notification was communicated to the petitioner on 11th February, 2020. Same are assailed in the present Writ Petition.
3. Mr.Atul Karad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per section 7 of the said Act, the term of petitioner as Part Time Chairman is for three years from the date of publication of appointment in the Official Gazette. He further submits that the petitioner was appointed on 9th July, 2019 by then State Government. Thereafter, the assembly elections took place in the month of October, 2019 and new State Government has formed by alliance o
B.P. Singhal V/s Union of India
Dnyaneshwar Digamber Kamble V/s State of Maharashtra and others
Jeevanrao Vishwanathrao Gore V/s State of Maharashtra and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Doctrine of Pleasure cannot be invoked in an arbitrary manner, and valid reasons are required for the removal of an appointed member. The ....
The doctrine of pleasure does not permit arbitrary or capricious exercise of power by the State, and such actions must comply with principles of fairness and Article 14 of the Constitution.
"Doctrine of Pleasure" has its genesis under common law - A public servant could be dismissed from service by Crown at its pleasure.
The doctrine of pleasure permits removal from office without adherence to principles of natural justice when the appointee does not hold a civil post.
The doctrine of pleasure allows for removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those holding civil posts under the Constitution.
The doctrine of pleasure permits removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those not holding civil posts under the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.