M. NAGAPRASANNA
Abdul Azeem – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER
M. Nagaprasanna, J. - The petitioner is before this Court initially seeking a direction to consider his representation dated 23-05-2023 and grant all consequential benefits. During the pendency of the petition, he raises a challenge to the Notification dated 15-12-2023 which removes the petitioner from the post of Chairman, Karnataka State Minorities Commission, Bengaluru ('the Commission for short).
2. Heard Smt. Lakshmy Iyengar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri K.Shashikiran Shetty, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:



B.P. Singhal vs Union Of India
Cheviti Venkanna Yadav Vs. State of Telangana and others reported in (2017) 1 SCC 283
D.K.Udaykumar VS. State of Karnataka reported in (2020) 3 KLJ 100
Dnyaneshwar Digamber Kamble vs State of Maharashtra
K.C. Shankare Gowda vs. The State of Karnataka
KHUSRO QURAISHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
KRISHNA S/o BULAJI BORATE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS' (2001) 2 SCC 441)
KUMARI SHRILEKHA VIDYARTHI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
Moti Ram Deka v. North East Frontier Railway [AIR 1964 SC 600]
OM Narain Agarwal Vs. Nagarpalika Shahajahanpur reported in (1993) 2 SCC 242
Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India [AIR 1958 SC 36]
RASID Javed Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reported in AIR 2010 SC 2275
State of Bihar v. Abdul Majid [AIR 1954 SC 245 : 1954 SCR 786]
State Of U.P. vs. U.P. State Law Officers Association
UNION OF INDIA v. SHARDINDU (2007) 6 SCC 276
UNION OF INDIA v. TULSIRAM PATEL (1985) 3 SCC 398
Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel [(1985) 3 SCC 398 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 672]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.